banner services

News & Views

R&D Tax Relief is Changing – Here’s What you Need to Know

Tax

Additional amendments to UK R&D tax relief were included in the 2022 Autumn Statement. Further details can be found here: Autumn Statement 2022 – Dixcart

From 1 April 2023, we are expecting a number of changes to the UK R&D scheme. This addendum summarises the key points arising from the July 2022 HMRC published draft legislation for R&D tax relief changes, announced in the 2021 Autumn Budget.

These Autumn Budget changes will take effect for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2023. The changes will impact companies claiming under either of the two schemes (SME or RDEC).

The government has a target to raise investment in R&D to 2.4% of UK GDP by 2027 and R&D tax relief forms part of that goal by reducing the cost of innovation for UK companies.

Here are some of the key changes:

Extending Qualifying Expenditure

The good news is that R&D expenditure categories will be extended to include the costs of datasets and cloud computing – however, these costs need to clearly align with direct R&D and cannot be included in R&D claims where these costs only relate to indirect supporting activities.

In addition to this, R&D in pure mathematics will now qualify for relief and can form part of the qualifying R&D activities of the claimant.

Refocusing the Reliefs Towards Innovation Undertaken in the UK

One of the most fundamental changes in the Autumn Budget was to refocus the relief provided to activities performed in the UK or qualifying overseas expenditure.

  • UK Expenditure

Relevant research and development must be undertaken in the United Kingdom. As such, subcontracted R&D work, and the cost of externally provided workers (EPWs), will be limited to work undertaken in the UK.

  • Qualifying Overseas Expenditure

The exemption to the above, is where work undertaken outside the UK is necessary due to geographical, environmental, or social conditions not present or replicable in the UK. Cost of the work, and availability of workers, are specifically excluded as factors. This list is not exhaustive and, in the short term, is likely to create greater uncertainty as to what could be seen as meeting these criteria.

It is worth noting that, to date, there is nothing in the draft legislation that specifically addresses claims for the cost of staff working on projects in an overseas branch of a UK entity- it is hoped this will be clarified as the Bill goes through the Parliamentary process.

Tackling Abuse

In order to support HMRC’s fight against abuse of the R&D schemes, new due diligence and filing processes will be required through a digital system.

The changes to be introduced to the R&D claims submission process include:

  1. claims be made digitally;
  2. the categories of qualifying expenditure incurred need to be disclosed, and brief details provided of the R&D activities;
  3. claims need to be endorsed by a named senior company officer;
  4. the company must inform HMRC in advance of its intention to make a claim within six months of the end of the period to which the claim relates, unless the company has claimed in one of the preceding three accounting periods; and
  5. the details of any agent who has advised the company in making the claim needs to be provided.

The most significant change is point 4. The effect of this is that new claimants will now only have a six month window in order to identify that they will make a claim, as opposed to the current two year window of opportunity.

What can your Business do to Help Maintain their R&D Tax Relief Benefits?

On the back of the above proposed changes, businesses that maintain all, or part, of their R&D activities overseas will need to re-evaluate their potential R&D claims. If your business falls into this category, you will need to consider the practical, commercial, and cost implications of maintaining your current structure versus onshoring to the UK. 

We have identified the pros and cons of each scenario below.

Scenario 1: Keeping your R&D Activities Overseas

Benefits of keeping your R&D activities abroad:

  • commercial needs,
  • expertise,
  • most cost-effective option,
  • changing something that isn’t broken. You have the right people, infrastructure and processes in place so why change it?

With the introduction of the new rules, the obvious loss is that qualifying overseas expenditure will be disqualified from 1 April 2023.

However, the impact of this depends on the type of business you are. For example, if you have an R&D intensive business with majority of costs arising from overseas activities, you should expect to see a substantial reduction in your R&D tax relief claims as opposed to one that is not R&D intensive.  

Scenario 2: Relocating your R&D Activities to the UK

As discussed above, the notable advantages and sacrifices of keeping your R&D activities overseas are in turn, for the short-term anyway, the opposite if you were to relocate the activities to the UK. This will of course depend on each business.

The main benefit of relocating your R&D activities to the UK is inevitably that it will qualify for R&D relief.

However, the change will effectively be like starting new again. The downside to this is the hassle of finding new suppliers and skilled workers, keeping within the budget, costs of relocating/restructuring, training, legal and tax considerations for both company and any employees relocating, etc.

Again, this largely depends on the business as, for some, this may simply be a matter of finding new suppliers within the UK.

Get in touch

If you would like to discuss the R&D tax relief changes announced in the Autumn Budget, or if you would like professional advice on maintaining R&D tax relief benefits, please get in touch: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

banner services

News & Views

Pre-arrival UK Tax Planning for non-UK Domiciled Individuals

Case Study

Due to the impact it can have on an individual’s UK tax liability, it is vital that domicile is fully understood by those wishing to relocate to the UK permanently.

In general terms, if a non-domiciled individual wishes to move to the UK permanently and has no intention to return to their previous country, then there is a strong case they will be considered UK domiciled for tax purposes.

Effective tax planning, pre-UK arrival is therefore critical to avoid potential costly surprises in the future.

UK Domiciled vs Non-domiciled Impact

Firstly, let’s briefly look at the UK tax implications for a person that is UK domiciled vs non-domiciled. Please note both individuals are UK tax resident in the year for this illustration.

Mr UK Domiciled

  • Liable to tax on worldwide income and gains
  • Worldwide assets are subject to UK inheritance tax

Miss Non-domiciled

  • Worldwide income and gains are taxable on the arising basis
  • A claim for the remittance basis can be made which will mean Miss Non-domiciled will only be taxed on her foreign income and gains if she remits it to the UK. If it is kept offshore, she will not be subject to UK tax
  • Non-UK situs assets are excluded from UK inheritance tax

From this, we can see that Mrs Non-domiciled position is usually more advantageous from a UK tax perspective. 

Determining your domicile

In establishing whether a new domicile of choice has been created, careful consideration must be taken for the following points before making a decision to move to the UK:

  • the intentions of the individual;
  • their permanent residence;
  • their business interests;
  • their social and family interests;
  • ownership of property; and
  • the form of any Will that they have made.

This list is by no means exhaustive and there is no single criteria which determines whether an individual is or is not domiciled in the UK. Instead, a ‘balance of probabilities’ approach is taken.

Defend your domicile

Taking into account the above, it is therefore essential to have provisions in place before arriving in the UK, to defend any potential challenge from HMRC.

Domicile enquires can be lengthy and intrusive should HMRC doubt an individual’s non-domicile claim. This can involve months or even years of correspondence involving various questions into background, lifestyle and family and social connections, both from a historic perspective and to establish future intentions.   

Acquiring and maintaining evidence of strong, ongoing links to the country of domicile is crucial for those claiming non-domiciled status, and so is evidence of an intention to leave the UK at a future date. This can be particularly problematic on death, potentially bringing a foreign estate within the scope of UK inheritance tax.

To avoid any hiccups in the future, it may be worth considering having a domicile statement prepared, to provide contemporaneous evidence supporting the claim . 

Case law

IRC v Bullock: Mr Bullock had a domicile of origin in Nova Scotia. He lived in England for 40 years. His wife did not want to live in Nova Scotia. Mr Bullock hoped to return there should he persuade his wife to change her mind or should he survive her. It was held by the Courts that he had a real determination to return rather than a vague aspiration. Accordingly he retained his Nova Scotian domicile of origin and had not acquired an English domicile of choice.

In contrast:

Furse v IRC: Mr Furse expressed a wish to live in England for the rest of his life save only for a contingency that he would return to the USA, should he cease to be physically able to take an active interest in his farm (situated in England). The Courts decided that this intention was so vague as to impose no limit on his intention to remain in England. Accordingly he had acquired an English domicile of choice.

Summary and Additional Information

From the above we can see it is difficult to make a judgement without fully examining an individual’s position in detail.

An individual’s domicile status is a fundamental factor in determining his/her liability to UK tax. It also has implications for other branches of the law.

Due to HMRC’s increased investigations into the tax affairs of non-domiciled, individuals should be prepared to present a robust defence in the event of any challenge from HMRC. A domicile statement can greatly assist, to provide evidence of an individual’s intentions, where it is supported by the facts, and can be particularly useful in situations where enquiries are opened by HMRC after death.

If you require additional information on this topic and further guidance regarding your domicile status, please contact your usual Dixcart adviser or speak to Paul Webb or Ravi Lal in the UK office: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News