banner services

News & Views

Employment Law General Update – December 2024

Employment Law

This month sees an emphasis on Equality through a landmark equal pay agreement, a follow up to the Sexism in the City inquiry and a further inquiry into how paternity and shared parental leave in the workplace can actually work. Meanwhile, the CIPD has carried out research which finds our systems are currently failing to help young people prepare for working life. And lastly, a warning change to compensation levels where the statutory Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement should be involved and some changes to the tribunal procedures.

  • Equality: Equal pay deal reached for thousands of women in Birmingham
  • Equality: HM Treasury, PRA and FCA respond to Treasury Committee questions about Sexism in the City inquiry recommendations
  • Parental Leave: Women and Equalities Committee launches inquiry into paternity and shared parental leave
  • Workforce: CIPD research finds half of employers believe young people are not ‘job ready’
  • Tribunals: Failure to follow code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement has compensation consequences effective from 20 January 2025
  • Tribunal Procedure: Changes to Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules from 6 January 2025

Equality: Equal pay deal reached for thousands of women in Birmingham

The BBC reported on 10 December that Birmingham City Council has reached a settlement with 6,000 staff members, mostly women, to end a long-standing dispute over pay inequality, with settlement payouts to be made after years of negotiations.

Birmingham City Council has reached a settlement with thousands of women in relation to their long-standing equal pay claims. The agreement, reached with the Unison and GMB unions, will see 6,000 staff members receive settlement payouts, bringing an end to the litigation that has run for many years. The issue of equal pay has been a major challenge for the council, with a bill of £760 million initially estimated to settle the claims. However, after several years of negotiations, a confidential agreement has been reached, which will be formally approved by the council’s cabinet on 17 December 2024.

The dispute centred around claims that staff in female-dominated roles, such as teaching assistants, have historically been underpaid compared to those in male-dominated positions. The GMB union has said that the settlement is a “significant step towards pay justice”. The settlement will also be a significant step forward for the council, which is reported to have paid out almost £1.1 billion in equal pay claims since 2012.

Back to the top

Equality: HM Treasury, PRA and FCA respond to Treasury Committee questions about Sexism in the City inquiry recommendations

The House of Commons Treasury Committee has published letters containing responses from HM Treasury, the PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority) and the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) relating to progress made against the recommendations set out in its report following its “Sexism in the City” inquiry.

On 10 December 2024, the House of Commons Treasury Committee published the following letters relating to its “Sexism in the City” inquiry, which provide information on progress made against its recommendations:

  • FCA (dated 29 November 2024). The FCA has prioritised work on the link between non-financial misconduct (NFM) and its rulebook and intends to publish a final policy statement on NFM in early 2025. The FCA is working through the large volume of feedback that it received on proposals relating to data collection and target setting and intends to set out next steps jointly with the PRA in Q2 2025. It is exploring ways in which diversity and inclusion (D&I) reporting might be simplified and more joined up. In 2025, the FCA plans to strengthen its messaging to whistleblowers and better promote whistleblowing reporting channels. This will include providing clearer guidance for whistleblowers who are impacted by a non-disclosure agreement, but who wish to report to the FCA. The FCA also comments on how it uses whistleblowing data and the introduction of a new approach to final feedback to whistleblowers.
  • PRA (dated 2 December 2024). The PRA acknowledges that developments in government policy (such as proposals for gender equality action plans and the plan for broadened pay gap reporting) may have an impact on its reporting and target setting proposals. It also comments on the removal of the bonus cap, reiterating the PRA and FCA expectation that firms should take care to avoid adverse impacts on pay gaps. The PRA states it will seek to review the impact of the bonus cap policy and whether it has affected gender pay gaps when sufficient evidence is available.
  • HM Treasury (dated 9 December 2024). HM Treasury’s letter focuses on priorities for supporting the development of women in the financial services sector. It refers to the Women in Finance Charter, which will retain its focus on senior management.

The letters respond to requests for information sent by Dame Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the Treasury Committee.

Back to the top

Parental Leave: Women and Equalities Committee launches inquiry into paternity and shared parental leave

The House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee launched an inquiry to examine options for reform of paternity and shared parental leave, and is conducting a call for evidence which lasts until 31 January 2025.

The Women and Equalities Committee (WEC), a Commons Select Committee, launched the inquiry into paternity rights and shared parental leave (SPL) on 6 December. The WEC believes that unequal division of childcaring responsibilities is a key driver of wider gender inequality and the gender pay gap. It wishes to examine options for reform of SPL and paternity leave with the aim of identifying the most effective ways of incentivising more equal sharing of childcare and wider domestic responsibilities between mothers and their partners.

The UK Parliament reports that: “MPs on the cross-party committee, chaired by Labour MP Sarah Owen, are seeking views on the schemes, via WEC’s inquiry page and through a survey, to help inform their work ahead of the Government’s proposed review of the parental leave system. The call for evidence forms part of WEC’s umbrella inquiry into Equality at work.

The Government has set out measures in the Employment Rights Bill to enhance family-friendly rights at work but has stopped short of fundamental changes to maternity, paternity, and shared parental leave and pay.

Instead, it has acknowledged that ‘the current parental leave system does not support working parents’ and has committed to conduct a ‘full review’ as the first stage of longer-term reform. Unequal division of childcaring responsibilities is a key driver of wider gender inequality and the gender pay gap.”

The WEC is conducting a call for evidence which lasts until 31 January 2025. Submissions are specifically requested on any of the following matters:

  • The extent to which SPL has given parents choice and flexibility in how they share parenting responsibilities.
  • The longer-term equality impacts and labour market impacts of SPL, particularly for women.
  • Reasons for low take-up of SPL and possible solutions.
  • Addressing inequalities in SPL take-up (including inequalities related to ethnicity, income, education and occupational status).
  • Alternatives to the current “maternal transfer” model of SPL.
  • Lessons from other countries.

A government evaluation of SPL in 2023 revealed very low uptake. A more recent analysis by campaign group The Dad Shift has highlighted that SPL uptake is heavily skewed against lower earning families.

Back to the top

Workforce: CIPD research finds half of employers believe young people are not ‘job ready’

Reported by People Management on 4 December 2024, apparently half (52 per cent) of UK employers say young people entering the workforce are generally not ‘job ready’, citing significant gaps in workplace skills and social adaptability, according to a new study from the CIPD. The Changing face of the youth labour market report also revealed that just over a quarter of employers (28 per cent) that hired a young person aged 16-24 in the past year felt they were well prepared for the demands of the workplace. Among the most significant challenges identified by employers were behavioural issues, with 71 per cent stating young people often did not know how to behave in professional settings. Similarly, 64 per cent of employers said young workers “lack important social skills”, while a third (34 per cent) identified communication difficulties as a key barrier to success.

Employers also noted differences in managing young workers compared to previous generations, with more than half (56 per cent) saying young workers were harder to manage. This generational shift has heightened the need for policies and initiatives to better prepare young people for the realities of working life.

The report highlighted a dramatic decline in opportunities for young people to combine earning and learning, which has significantly impacted their readiness for work. Despite government efforts to promote apprenticeships, just 6 per cent of 16 to 24 year olds are currently participating in one – a figure that has not changed in 20 years. In 2024, only 20 per cent of 16 to 17 year olds were combining earning and learning, down from 42 per cent in 1997, while, for 18 to 24 year olds, the figure dropped to 34 per cent from 40 per cent over the same period. Furthermore, the number of 16 to 24 year olds who had never held a job, excluding seasonal or holiday work, has risen by nearly a third over the past two decades.

To address these issues, the CIPD is calling on the government to introduce an apprenticeship guarantee for all 16 to 24 year olds. This initiative, which is supported by nearly 90 per cent of employers according to previous CIPD research, aims to create more vocational routes into employment while helping young people build crucial workplace skills such as communication, teamwork and problem solving.

Back to the top

Tribunals: Failure to follow code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement has compensation consequences effective from 20 January 2025

The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (Amendment of Schedule A2) Order 2024 (SI 1272/2024) has been made and is due to come into force on 20 January 2025. Section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA 1992) gives an employment tribunal power to increase or reduce any award it makes by up to 25% for any unreasonable failure to comply with the provisions of a relevant statutory code of practice in respect of any of the heads of claims listed in Schedule A2 to TULRCA 1992. The Order, which was published in draft in October 2024, amends Schedule A2 to add section 189 of TULRCA 1992 to take account of the statutory Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement (Code).

The effect of the order is that, if a successful claim is brought under section 189 of TULRCA 1992 for a protective award, an employment tribunal can increase or reduce any award by up to 25% if a party has unreasonably failed to comply with the Code or another applicable code of practice.

Back to the top

Tribunal Procedure: Changes to Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules from 6 January 2025

On 6 December 2024, the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (SI 2024/1155) (‘ETPR’) and the Employment Tribunals (Procedure Rules) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/1156) (‘Amendment Regulations’) were laid before Parliament. The Amendment Regulations will remove the current ET Rules from Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1237) (‘ET Regulations’) and bring the ETPR into force in their place on 6 January 2025.

The ETPR introduce two new rules to give the tribunal greater flexibility to delegate functions of a judicial nature to legal officers (rule 7), and expressly give the Presidents of the tribunals the power to prescribe claim and response forms by Practice Directions, instead of the Secretary of State (rule 9). Amendments have also been made to the following rules:

  • Rule 42 (replacing current rule 42): clarifying when the tribunal will consider written representations.
  • Rule 49 (replacing current rule 50): confirming that the tribunal may order the redaction of personal details, including addresses, from the claim and response forms and other documents.
  • Rule 58 (replacing current rule 60): clarifying that decisions made by legal officers without a hearing should identify the legal officer who made the decision.
  • Rules 59 and 60 (replacing current rules 61 and 62): replacing the requirement for the written records and written reasons of tribunal decisions to be signed by an employment judge with a requirement that they be approved by the presiding member.
  • Rule 98 (replacing current rule 99): allowing the Vice President, in addition to the President, in Scotland to be able to consent to the transfer of a case to Scotland.

The rules relating to fees in the current ET Rules have not been replicated in the ETPR. The national security rules of procedure and the equal value rules of procedure, currently contained within schedules 2 and 3 of the ET Regulations, are replicated as schedule 1 and 2 to the ETPR respectively.

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary have produced a table comparing the ET Rules and ETPR, see: Comparison Table: The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Back to the top

Further Information:

If you would like any additional information, please contact Anne-Marie Pavitt or Sophie Banks on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

banner services

News & Views

Employment Law General Update – October 2024

Employment Law

Big changes are afoot this month with the introduction of the new Labour government’s Employment Rights Bill, aiming to fix problems perceived by the Labour party during their long stint in opposition, such as addressing one-sided flexibility, supporting more family friendly rights and prioritising fairness, equality and wellbeing of workers, ensuring fair pay, modernising trade union legislation and improving enforcement of employment rights. Consultation over the Bill will start now and continue in 2025, with the aim to implement the changes in 2026. We also bring you updates on sexual harassment, proposed employment rights for parents of still-born children and those born prematurely, guidance on the new Tipping Act, and a change in equality office.

  • Legislation: Government publishes Employment Rights Bill
  • Protection at Work: The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 to comes into force on 26 October 2024 and EHRC updates its harassment guidance and publishes eight-step guide for employers on preventing sexual harassment at work
  • Parents: New private members’ bill on Still-Birth and leave for Neo-natal care
  • Pay: New Tipping Act and supplementary Code of Practice comes into force –  guidance available
  • Equality: Office for Equality and Opportunity replaces the Equality Hub

Legislation: Government publishes Employment Rights Bill

Background: In September 2021, the Labour Party first introduced its plan for working people in its ‘A new deal for working people’, launched at the Labour Party Conference. The document underwent several iterations, with the final version, Labour’s Plan to make work pay: Delivering a new deal for working people (New Deal), published just prior to the release of the manifesto in June 2024. The Labour Manifesto reiterated a number of the promises set out in the New Deal document and stated that the New Deal would be implemented in full within the first 100 days of the Labour government. The King’s Speech on 17 July 2024 confirmed that Labour’s plans would be implemented through the Employment Rights Bill 2024 (Bill) and the Equality (Race and Disability) Bill 2024. The Employment Rights Bill 2024 was published on 10 October 2024.

When will the Bill come into force? Commencement regulations will be required to bring provisions into force, with the exception of provisions on trade unions and industrial action, which will come into force two months from the day on which the Act is passed, and the repeal of the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 and related provisions, which will come into force on the date the Act is passed.

What does the Bill plan to do? The Bill implements a large number of the reforms promised in the Labour Party’s New Deal document. Alongside the Bill, the government has also published a policy document entitled Next Steps to Make Work Pay (Next Steps) and a set of explanatory notes. The document sets out the government’s plan generally as well as the next steps in implementation for many of the measures.

Laid out below is a summary of the current position, the changes promised prior to the Bill and the expected reforms in relation to the measures set out in the Bill.

Zero hours and ‘low hours’ contracts: Zero-hour contracts are contracts of employment which lack a minimum number of guaranteed working hours and which do not require a minimum commitment from the employee. This means the working hours of an individual are unpredictable and may vary wildly from week to week. Although, individuals on zero-hour contracts do have a number of statutory protections, these are based solely on employment status. At present there is no definition as to what ‘low hours’ means. This will be the subject of consultation.

In order to provide more security for individuals on zero-hour contracts, the Labour Party promised to:

  • ban ‘exploitative’ zero hours contracts;
  • ensure a right to a contract reflecting the number of hours regularly worked and is likely to be based on a 12-week reference period;
  • ensure workers get reasonable notice of any shifts or working time changes, with proportionate compensation for cancelled or shortened shifts;
  • introduce anti-avoidance measures; and
  • end ‘one sided’ flexibility by ensuring all jobs provide a baseline level of security and predictability.

The Bill sets out a right to guaranteed hours where a worker regularly works more than those hours. The guaranteed hours are calculated according to a reference period, which is expected to be 12 weeks. Employers will be required to make an offer of guaranteed hours to workers at the start of employment and at the end of each reference period. Workers can also submit claims to the employment tribunal where an employer has failed to comply with their duty to offer guaranteed hours, or where that offer does not comply with the necessary requirements.

The Next Steps document states that the government intends to consult on the details and to ensure the Bill’s provisions on zero hours contracts are effectively and appropriately applied to agency workers.

Fire and re-hire: Currently, employers wishing to introduce changes to the terms and conditions of an employment contract have the option of terminating the contract (with the requisite notice) and offering immediate re-engagement to the affected employee on new terms. While in government, the Conservative party introduced a statutory Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement with guidance on engaging in meaningful consultation and exploring alternatives. However, the Labour Party have since committed to ending ‘fire and rehire’ practices entirely in addition to reforming the existing fire and rehire Code and introducing more effective remedies against abuse.

In place of the Code of Practice, clause 22 of the Bill inserts a new section 104I into the Employment Rights Act 1996, which makes a dismissal unfair where the reason for the dismissal is that:

  • the employer sought to vary an employee’s contract and the employee did not agree, or
  • the employer sought to employ another person or re-engage the employee under a varied contract to carry out substantially the same duties.

This will not apply where the employer shows that the reason for the variation was to eliminate, prevent or significantly reduce, or significantly mitigate the effect of, any financial difficulties which at the time of the dismissal were affecting, or were likely in the immediate future to affect, the employer’s ability to carry on the business as a going concern or otherwise to carry on the activities constituting the business, and in all the circumstances the employer could not reasonably have avoided the need to make the variation.


Unfair dismissal qualifying period: Under section 108(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the right not to be unfairly dismissed generally only arises where the employee has been continuously employed for a period of at least two years; however the rule is subject to a number of statutory exceptions. The Labour Party has promised to remove the two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims, making it a ‘day one’ right.

The Bill will repeal s.108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and remove the two-year qualifying period. However, there will be a new ‘initial period of employment’ (or ‘probationary period’) during which the employer can dismiss an employee for certain reasons, subject to following a specified procedure. The length of the initial period and the details of the procedure will be subject to consultation—see Probationary periods below.

Sick pay (SSP): SSP is currently available to employees who are deemed to have been too ill to undertake any work for a period of at least four consecutive days. Employees must also earn above the lower weekly earnings limit (currently at £123) in order to qualify for SSP. The Labour Manifesto laid out the Party’s commitment to removing the qualifying period for statutory sick pay making it also a ‘day one’ right and removing the lower earnings limit. The Bill reflects both these promises in clauses 8 and 9.

The government will consult on the percentage replacement rate for those earning below the current flat rate of SSP, before bringing it into force as an amendment to the Bill. Furthermore, the Next Steps document states that the new Fair Work Agency will be given responsibility for ensuring SSP enforcement.

Parental leave: Parents of a child (whether born to the parents or adopted) are entitled to take up to 18 weeks of unpaid leave to care for that child at any time before the child’s 18th birthday. Currently parents must have worked continuously for an employer for at least one year to qualify for parental leave. The Bill will make parental leave a ‘day one’ right.

Probationary periods: As noted above, the Bill introduces the concept of an ‘initial period of employment’ (or ‘probationary period’) where dismissals for specified reasons will not be considered unfair. The government has further committed in the Next Steps document to consulting on the length of that initial statutory probation period and to consult on how it interacts with ACAS’s Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures to ensure that ‘day one’ rights will not be affected by the statutory probation period.

Flexible working: The Employment Rights Act 1996 provides employees with a statutory right to request certain specified changes to their employment contract. However. employees must have had at least 26 weeks’ of continuous service in order to qualify for the right. Earlier legislative changes were made from 6 April 2024, including making the right to request a day one right. However, the grounds upon which an employer can reject a request remain broad.

The Bill introduces a reasonableness requirement into an employer’s decision not to grant flexible working requests, and requirement for the employer to explain to the employee why they consider it reasonable to refuse the request.

Protection for new mothers: Currently, dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy or maternity will be deemed to be an automatically unfair dismissal. This means that an employee dismissed under these circumstances does not require the two years of continuous employment ordinarily needed to bring a claim in the employment tribunal. A woman who takes ordinary maternity leave is also entitled to return to the ‘same job’ at the end of that leave unless that job is no longer available.

The Plan to make work pay also included a promise to strengthen these protections by making it unlawful, except in specified circumstances, to dismiss a woman who has had a baby for six months after she returns to work.

The Bill provides the Secretary of State with the power to make provision for regulations restricting dismissal of an individual during pregnancy or for a period after pregnancy.

Paternity leave: Currently an employee may take paternity leave to support a mother or adopter in taking care of a new child, subject to (among other things) having at least 26 weeks’ qualifying employment. Under the Bill, paternity leave will become a ‘day one’ right.

Bereavement leave: Employees are entitled to Parental bereavement leave (PBL) following the death of a child if they meet the requisite parental relationship conditions and comply with the notice requirements. PBL is a ‘day one’ right; however it is currently only available to employees. The Bill extends the right to take PBL to any ‘bereaved person’. PBL will no longer be limited to circumstances involving the death of a child. A bereaved person will be entitled to take leave for the death of any person as long as they meet the other relevant conditions set out in the regulations.

Equality action plans: Amendments to the Equality Act 2010 made by the Bill will require large employers (with 250 employees or more) to publish equality action plans showing the steps that the employer is taking in relation to their employees with regard to prescribed matters related to gender equality, and to publish prescribed information relating to the plan. These will need to cover addressing the gender pay gap and supporting employees going through the menopause.

Fair Work Agency: The Labour Party has committed to amalgamating the HMRC National Minimum Wage unit, the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate and the Gangmasters Labour Abuse Authority into a single enforcement body known as the Fair Work Agency. The Bill establishes the Fair Work Agency which will be responsible for:

  • minimum wage and statutory sick pay enforcement;
  • the employment tribunal penalty scheme;
  • labour exploitation and modern slavery; and
  • enforcement of holiday pay policy (a new responsibility, which was not originally included in the New Deal document).

Fair pay agreements for social care workers: The Labour Party promised to consult on a new Fair Pay Agreement to create a New Deal for Social Care Workers. The Bill provides for the creation of an Adult Social Care Negotiating Body with a remit over remuneration, terms and conditions of employment and any matters specified by the Secretary of State, for social care workers. Agreements over remuneration which have been ratified by the Secretary of State must be paid in accordance with the agreement and any other term will have effect as a term of a worker’s contract. A consultation on how the Fair Pay Agreement should work is promised ‘soon’.

School support staff: The School Support Staff Negotiating Body, the pay body for school support staff, was abolished some time ago. The Labour Party stated that it would reinstate the Body, and task it with establishing a national terms and conditions handbook, training, career progression routes and fair pay rates for support staff to help to address the recruitment and retention crisis. The Bill re-establishes the School Support Staff Negotiating Body.

Trade unions: The Employment Rights Bill makes provision for changes to trade union law relating to:

  • a worker’s right to a statement of trade union rights;
  • a trade union’s right of access to a workplace;
  • trade union recognition;
  • members’ contributions to political funds, and public sector check-off arrangements;
  • time off rights for trade union officials, learning representatives and union equality representatives; and
  • blacklisting.

An employer will be required to give a worker a written statement that the worker has a right to join a trade union at the same time as the employer gives the worker a written statement of employment particulars. Secondary legislation will stipulate what information must be included in the statement, the form the statement must take and the manner in which the statement must be given.

The Employment Bill introduces a new framework for trade unions to request physical access to an employer’s workplace for the purposes of meeting, representing, recruiting or organising workers, and/or facilitating collecting bargaining. Access agreements are to be negotiated in the first instance between the employer and the trade union, with a referral to the Central Arbitration Committee provided for if agreement cannot be reached.

Thresholds required for a trade union to qualify for, and achieve, statutory recognition will be amended, with double thresholds removed where relevant and replaced by a simplified requirement for unions to demonstrate appropriate levels of support. In relation to individual contributions to a political fund of the trade union, the default position will be that individual members will be contributors to the political fund unless they specifically opt out (rather than the other way around, which is the current position.

Changes to the check-off arrangements for public sector workers introduced by s.15 of the Trade Union Act 2016 on 9 May 2024 are to be repealed.

Where an employer permits an employee or a learning representative to take time off for carrying out their duties under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (ss.168 and 168A), it will also be expected, if requested, to provide reasonable accommodation and other facilities for carrying out those duties.

A new right for reasonable time off for union equality representatives is introduced to support duties related to promoting equality in the workplace.

Secondary legislation will be introduced to extend blacklisting protections; it will be unlawful not only to compile lists of trade union members etc, but also to use such lists for the purposes of discrimination in relation to recruitment or in relation to the treatment of workers, and/or to sell or supply such lists for those purposes.

Industrial action: Changes are proposed in relation to:

  • balloting and notification requirements for lawful industrial action
  • lawful picketing;
  • detriment and dismissal for participating in lawful industrial action; and
  • restrictions on those working in regulated services from participating in industrial action.

Ballot participation thresholds will be done away with and support thresholds for industrial action will be the majority of those voting in the ballot. Additional balloting thresholds for those engaged in public services will also be done away with. Information that must be included on the voting paper in a ballot is to be significantly reduced and simplified. Provision is made for electronic balloting to be introduced.

The period of notice to be given to an employer to notify it of industrial action is to be reduced from 14 days to seven days.

Lawful picketing will no longer be dependent on the union supervision requirements contained in s.220A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which is to be done away with.

A new right for workers to be protected from detriment for participating in protected industrial action, or to deter them from doing so, is to be introduced, and protection against dismissal for participating in protected industrial action is to be extended.

The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 is to be repealed, and industrial action restrictions on workers working in services that have been designated ‘relevant’ services under the Act are accordingly lifted.

Further reform: In addition to the anticipated reforms announced in the Labour Party’s New Deal and Manifesto, the Bill includes some measures which had not previously been anticipated. Clauses 16–18 of the Bill contain new provisions on sexual harassment, expanding the duty to prevent sexual harassment set to come into force on 26 October 2024 under the Worker Protection (Amendment Of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023. The new sections introduce:

  • liability for harassment by third parties;
  • provision for disclosures about sexual harassment qualifying as a protected disclosure under S.43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996; and
  • the addition of specified steps that an employer must take to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps in the prevention of sexual harassment for the purposes of the legislation.

The government will also consult on lifting the cap of the protective award if an employer is found to not have properly followed the statutory collective redundancy processes and on the role interim relief could play in protecting workers in these situations.

As stated above, the Next Steps document provides a general timeline on the implementation of the measures and reforms set out in the Bill. The majority of the measures in the Bill are set to be brought in through commencement legislation, and a number will go through a consultation process before their eventual implementation. According to the Next Steps document, the government expects to start consulting in 2025, although the government is ahead of itself in this regard and launched four consultations on 21 October 2024. The four consultations, which run until early December 2024, seek views of the Bill’s measures relating to a new right to guaranteed hours for zero or low hours workers, collective redundancy consultation and ‘fire and rehire’ practices, trade union legislation and statutory sick pay.  This means that any substantive reforms are unlikely to take effect much before 2026. This also means the Bill is likely to see some amendment before all the measures fully come into force.

The Next Steps document also refers to a number of reforms not included in the Bill which the government is nevertheless committed to introducing. These are:

  • a full review of the parental leave system;
  • a review of the implementation of carer’s leave and an examination of the benefits of introducing paid carer’s leave;
  • a consultation on workplace surveillance technologies;
  • consultations on the creation and implementation of a single ‘worker’ status;
  • a call for evidence on TUPE 2006 regulations and processes;
  • a review of health and safety in the workplace aimed at modernising guidance and regulations;
  • a joint consultation with ACAS on collective grievances;
  • the introduction of a new National Procurement Policy Statement aimed at reforming the public procurement ahead of the commencement of the Procurement Act 2023 in February 2025; and
  • an extension of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to private companies that hold public contracts and publicly funded employers.

Back to the top

Protection at work: The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 to comes into force on 26 October 2024 and EHRC updates its harassment guidance and publishes eight-step guide for employers on preventing sexual harassment at work

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 comes into force on 26 October 2024. The Act will:

  • Introduce a duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees.
  • Give employment tribunals the power to uplift discrimination compensation by up to 25% where an employer is found to have breached the duty to prevent sexual harassment.

At present it’s only a duty to take ‘reasonable steps’, the new Employment Rights Bill already includes a change to ‘all reasonable steps’ which no doubt will come into force in due course.  The Employment Rights Bill will also re-introduce employer liability for third party harassment in relation to all relevant protected characteristics under the Equality Act (sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, etc.)

Sexual harassment occurs where both:

  • A engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature.
  • The conduct has the purpose or effect of either violating B’s dignity, or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for B.

The EHRC has published an updated technical guidance for employers on the steps they can take to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. The EHRC has also published an eight-step practical guide to assist with this preventative duty, including developing an effective anti-harassment policy, using a reporting system that allows workers to raise an issue either anonymously or in name, and regularly monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of an employer’s actions.

Back to the top

Parents: New private members’ bill on Still-Birth and leave for Neo-natal care

The Still-Birth (Definition) Bill (a Private Members’ Bill sponsored by Liberal Democrat peer, Baroness Benjamin) received its first reading in the House of Lords on 14 October 2024. The Bill would amend the definition of still-birth to apply from 20 weeks into a pregnancy, rather than from 24 weeks as currently is the case, including for the purposes of entitlement to maternity allowance under section 35 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992.

Currently under the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 (which received Royal Assent on 24 May 2023) employees with responsibility for children receiving neonatal care will be entitled to receive up to 12 weeks of paid leave per year. Regulations bringing into force its main provisions are awaited.

The latest edition of HMRC’s Employer Bulletin confirms that from 6 April 2025 HMRC will begin to administer statutory neonatal care pay (SNCP). The Bulletin informs employers that SNCP:

  • is claimable in the first 28 days following the birth of a child after they have spent seven consecutive days in neonatal care
  • can be paid for a maximum period of 12 weeks but will allow some flexibility dependent upon individual parental circumstances and other statutory payments to which they may be entitled.

Back to the top

Pay: New Tipping Act and supplementary Code of Practice comes into force –  guidance available

On 1 October 2024, the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 and statutory Code of Practice on fair and transparent distribution of tips came into force. Under the Act, employers must distribute tips in a ‘fair and transparent’ manner, passing all tips, gratuities, and service charges on to workers, without deductions. Failure to do so could result in employment tribunal claims by workers seeking to enforce their rights.

The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) has published guidance on tips and service charges in relation to the Act and supplementary Code of Practice which are both now in force. The guidance explains what the new law says, sharing tips fairly, and the obligation to have a written policy and to keep records. The guidance also covers which tips the law applies to, when tips must be paid, tronc systems and what happens if tips are not being paid correctly.

The DBT has also published non-statutory guidance for employers for employers on distributing tips fairly. The guidance is aimed at helping employers apply the statutory code of practice on fair and transparent distribution of tips, and applies to all sectors and businesses where tips are received. The guidance is not part of the statutory Code of Practice, legal advice or an exhaustive account of what is acceptable under either the Employment Rights Act 1996 or the statutory Code of Practice.

Back to the top

Equality: Office for Equality and Opportunity replaces the Equality Hub

The Equality Hub has been replaced by the Office for Equality and Opportunity. The Office for Equality and Opportunity will cover the overall framework of equality legislation in the UK, including disability policy, ethnic disparities, gender equality and LGBT+ rights.

Back to the top

Further Information:

If you would like any additional information, please contact Anne-Marie Pavitt or Sophie Banks on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

banner services

News & Views

Employment Law General Update – March 2024

reporting regime Employment Law

We bring news of several changes to the leave allowances for parents and carers in this month’s update. We also look at the latest report from the Treasury about the shocking levels of sexual harassment and bullying in the city whilst the Parker Review has found while there has been some improvement in ethnic minority representation on boards, there is still plenty of room for improvement. We also share news on the new ICO guidance on information sharing in a mental health emergency at work.

  • Discrimination: Sexism in the City report finds ‘shocking’ levels of sexual harassment and bullying
  • Data Protection: ICO issues guidance on information sharing in a mental health emergency at work

Parental & Carer’s Leave: New Regulations come into force

The new Paternity Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/329) are made to amend the Paternity and Adoption Leave Regulations 2002, SI 2002/2788, the Paternity and Adoption Leave (Adoption from Overseas) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/921, and the Paternity, Adoption and Shared Parental Leave (Parental Order Cases) Regulations 2014, SI 2014/3096. They came into force on 8 March 2024 and apply to children whose:

  • expected week of childbirth is after 6 April 2024; or
  • expected date of placement for adoption, or expected date of entry into Great Britain for adoption, is on or after 6 April 2024.

The changes include, amongst other things:

  • allowing an employee to choose to take either two non-consecutive weeks’ paternity leave (birth), or a single period of either one week or two weeks; and
  • extending the period in which paternity leave (birth) must be taken from 56 days after the birth of the child, to 52 weeks after the birth.

The new Maternity Leave, Adoption Leave and Shared Parental Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/264) are made to extend an existing statutory protection from redundancy that currently applies to those employees who are on maternity, adoption or shared parental leave. The extension means this protection also applies to pregnant women and new parents who have recently returned from any period of maternity or adoption leave, or from a period of six or more weeks of shared parental leave. The Regulations are due to come into force on 6 April 2024. Therefore any employers currently considering commencing a redundancy process or in the middle of one should review any affected employees who may now be protected under these new Regulations.

The Carer’s Leave Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/251) are made to implement a new statutory entitlement to Carer’s Leave for employees from 6 April 2024. They ensure that this leave will be available to employees for the purpose of caring for a dependant with a long-term care need. They are also due to come into force on 6 April 2024.

These are supported by The Carer’s Leave (Consequential Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/266) which make necessary amendments to various pieces of secondary legislation in consequence of the Carer’s Leave Act 2023 which makes provision for the new statutory right to carer’s leave, available for employed carers from 6 April 2024. When calculating entitlements to certain other benefits or rights, leave is often a relevant factor. This instrument makes provision to ensure that it is clear in those pieces of secondary legislation how carer’s leave should be treated in those calculations.

Back to the top 

Discrimination: Sexism in the City report finds ‘shocking’ levels of sexual harassment and bullying

The Treasury Committee has published its Sexism in the City report, following an inquiry launched in July 2023, and is calling for an end to the ‘era of impunity’ after finding a ‘shocking’ prevalence of sexual harassment and bullying, and a culture which is ‘holding back women’ in the City. The Committee welcomes proposals by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to strengthen their regimes for tackling non-financial misconduct, including sexual harassment, but calls on them to ‘drop their prescriptive plans for extensive data reporting and target setting’. The FCA has responded to the report.

Back to the top

Diversity and Gender Pay Gap: Parker Review Committee update report expands scope of targets for ethnic minority representation

The Parker Review Committee has published its March 2024 report into ethnic diversity across UK businesses. For the first time, the Committee has expanded its review to include senior management data, commenting that this yields a clearer picture than looking into boards of directors alone. It has also expanded its research to include private companies (50 in total) as well as listed companies. The report found that:

  • 96% of FTSE 100 companies have at least one ethnic minority director on their board, compared with 44% of private companies;
  • ethnic minorities currently represent an average of 13% of senior management positions within FTSE 100 companies, with a target set to increase this average to 17% by 2027.

Hywel Ball, Chairman and Managing Partner of EY UK, says:

The Parker Review, and the targets that it sets, provide an important benchmark and objective criteria to encourage fair representation of ethnic minorities. Crucially, it ensures we lead efforts to diversify UK business with respect to ethnicity from the top down and continue to be held accountable, no matter the macroeconomic climate. Representation matters – the more diverse boardroom and executive teams are, the greater the ripples across the organisation. Over the last nine years, there has been good progress but we are still a long way from achieving parity based on ethnicity. This year’s figures – 12 ethnic minority CEOs in the FTSE 100 and 7 Chairs – are encouraging but show there is work to be done to ensure our business leaders fairly represent their customers and society they serve.”

Back to the top

Data Protection: ICO issues guidance on information sharing in a mental health emergency at work

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued guidance for employers on sharing their workers’ personal information in a mental health emergency. The guidance sets out advice on when, and how, it is appropriate to share workers’ personal information where the employer believes that someone is at risk of causing serious harm to themselves or others due to their mental health. The ICO adds that it is good practice to plan ahead in order to make timely and better-informed decisions during a mental health emergency. The guidance considers what a mental health emergency is, how mental health information differs under data protection law, how to plan for information sharing and the lawful bases and special category conditions that are most likely to apply.

Back to the top

Further Information:

If you would like any additional information, please contact Anne-Marie Pavitt or Sophie Banks on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

banner services

News & Views

Employment Law General Update – January 2023

Director services Employment Law

As we welcome in the fresh new year, there is a need to focus on helping employees with health issues as the NHS struggles more than ever. We highlight three areas where employers can make a real difference. Other challenges this year come from union strikes, and the government looks to balance the rights of strikers with continuing to provide minimum levels of service in specified public services in a new bill before the Commons, along with an update on the Neonatal Care Bill which covers parental leave. With people working more flexibly consultations have started on proposals to pro-rata holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers.

  • Employee Health: Three wellbeing challenges employers will need to tackle in 2023
  • Trade Unions: House of Commons library publishes briefing on Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill
  • Parental Leave: House of Commons publishes update on Neonatal Care Bill
  • Holiday Pay: BEIS consults on proposals to pro-rata holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers

 Employee Health: Three wellbeing challenges employers will need to tackle in 2023

Website, People Management, published an article on 20 January 2023 by Imogen Cardwell (Clinical Operations Director at PAM OH) promoting a proactive approach from employers to address health challenges facing employees including soaring cancer rates, increasing work-related illness and NHS delays. You can read the full article [here] but below is a summarised version.

She reports that with an NHS backlog of more than 7.2 million, it will impact more than a million employees, with 15 per cent of employees affected being forced to go on long-term sick leave, and 40 per cent of cancer patients are having to wait more than the 62-day target for life-saving cancer treatment . At the same time, two-fifths of employees believe work has made them sick, primarily due to work-related stress and musculoskeletal (MSK) issues. All of which means the NHS backlog, rising cancer cases and increasing work-related illness are the three major wellbeing challenges employers will need to address in 2023.

Challenge 1: Supporting employees with cancer

Employers will need to do more to support terminally ill employees to stay in work, so long as it is safe to do so. This is both a legal duty, under the Equality Act 2010, but also a moral duty. Integral to this is supporting employees by making the reasonable adjustments needed to allow them to remain in work, such as allowing flexible working or changing working hours for a period to account for someone’s needs.

Managers should be encouraged to talk to employees about what they think would help them and an occupational health clinician can also advise on appropriate adjustments that would work for the individual and business, both now and as the employee goes through important milestones and treatments.

Challenge 2: Ongoing NHS delays

Before the pandemic, employees would typically get signed off work by their GP until after they had been treated and had some post-surgery rehabilitation, which might have been around 6 weeks. With wait times of up to a year, this might not be acceptable going forward. Be aware of the risk of financial hardship, and long-term absence which has been shown to lead to lack of confidence, isolation and an increased risk of future worklessness.

Again, reasonable adjustments to help keep people in work will be critical going forward. Workplace wellbeing initiatives or occupational health advisors might also be able to support the individual with linked conditions, for example, losing weight to reduce joint pain and need for an operation.

Challenge 3: Soaring work-related illness

Days lost to work-related ill health cost billions per year, primarily work-related stress, depression or anxiety and MSK issues. What drives these issues? Employers should review their health data, including referrals to occupational health and health screening insights. As well as conduct ‘employee listening’ with surveys designed to uncover the root causes of work-related stress. This can often be addressed with workshops and manager training based on the HSE’s Management Standards for reducing stress, which look at everything from workload to working relationships.

In the case of soaring MSK issues, workplace risk assessments can be used to identify where employees are setting themselves up for future injury. While body mapping workshops, where employees place stickers on body maps to reveal where they have injuries or niggles, can also be used. These encourage employees to share tips and advice with one another on how they’re using the same equipment, or doing the same job, in a way that prevents injury. As it’s often the smallest behavioural changes that make the biggest difference.

A free guide to Health at Work is available from PAM Wellbeing here.

Back to the top

Trade Unions: House of Commons library publishes briefing on Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill

The House of Commons (HoC) Library has published a research briefing on the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill, which was introduced to the House of Commons and given its first reading on 10 January 2023. The Bill enables regulations to be made by the Secretary of State at the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (after consultation) setting minimum levels of service in specified public services so that those services do not completely shut down when there are strikes. For these purposes a strike does not include an overtime ban or a call-out ban. The Bill would grant the Secretary of State the power to set ‘minimum service regulations’ that could set minimum service levels for workers during strikes in the following sectors:

• health services

• fire and rescue services

• education services

• transport services

• decommissioning of nuclear installations and management of radioactive waste and spent fuel

• border security.

The Bill grants employers the power to give a ‘work notice’ to a trade union about any strike that affects a service subject to the Bill. The notice would have to specify which workers the employer to continue work in order to ensure service levels required by the minimum service regulations. Where a union fails to ‘take reasonable steps’ to ensure compliance with the work notice it loses protection from liability. Furthermore, the Bill removes automatic protection from unfair dismissal for any employee who strikes contrary to a valid work notice.

The second reading of the Bill was due to take place on 16 January 2023.

Back to the top 

Parental Leave: House of Commons publishes update on Neonatal Care Bill

The House of Commons (HoC) has published a briefing paper on the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Bill 2022–23, which was introduced by Stuart C McDonald MP as a Private Member’s Bill on 15 June 2022.

The Bill would introduce neonatal care leave and statutory neonatal care pay. As these are both new rights, they require the Minister to pass regulations to bring them into force. Parents whose children spend at least one week in neonatal care would qualify for the day one right to neonatal leave. The duration of the leave and when it must be taken would be set by regulations. It would be a minimum of one week and the period in which it could be availed of would last a minimum of 67 weeks starting from the date of the child’s birth. Employees with at least 26 weeks continuous service can avail of neonatal care pay during periods of neonatal leave. While limit and duration of pay would be set by regulations the minimum limit that could be claimed would be a minimum of 12 weeks.

There have been calls since 2014 for such a bill to be introduced. Following a consultation, the Government committed to introduce neonatal care and pay in March 2020. This was reiterated by the then Labour Markets Minister Paul Scully when he was responding to a parliamentary question on 25 May 2022. All MP’s who spoke during the second reading of the Bill were in favour of it passing. Similarly, all contributions at committee stage were in favour of the Bill and all amendments were accepted. However, concerns over the length of time the government were taking to implement the Bill were also raised.

Back to the top

Holiday Pay: BEIS consults on proposals to pro-rata holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers

The Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) is conducting a consultation on proposals to pro-rata holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers based on the annual hours they work. The consultation follows the recent Supreme Court judgment in Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] IRLR 67.

As part of the consultation, BEIS proposes to introduce a holiday entitlement reference period for part-year and irregular hours workers. BEIS wants to ensure that holiday pay and entitlement is directly proportionate to the time part-year and irregular hours staff are working. The consultation also aims to understand how entitlement is currently calculated for agency workers and how the consultation proposal could be implemented.

The consultation may be of interest and impact employers, workers, business representative groups, unions, and those representing the interests of groups in the labour market.

Responses to the consultation can be completed online here. Responses can also be emailed to: holidayentitlementconsultation@beis.gov.uk. The consultation closes on 9 March 2023.

Further information regarding the Calculating holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers Consultation can be accessed here. The Proposal to simplify Holiday Pay and Entitlement Consultation Impact Assessment can be accessed here. 

Further Information:

If you would like any additional information, please contact Anne-Marie Pavitt or Sophie Banks on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News