banner services

News & Views

Legal Update March 2025  

Commercial Property Law

Landlord and Tenant Act 1954: Consultation

Overview

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. It focuses on the renewal of business tenancies, known as Security of Tenure, and evaluates whether it still works as intended and meets the needs of both business tenants and landlords.

Security of Tenure

Under the current law, commercial tenants have the right to renew tenancies when they expire. However, tenants can choose to “contract out” of the right for a lease renewal when they are granted their tenancy.

The landlord has the right to oppose a renewal of the tenancy based on a few limited grounds. These grounds are:

  • Premises are in disrepair;
  • Arrears of rent;
  • Other breaches of covenant;
  • Suitable alternative accommodation;
  • Tenancy was created by a sub-letting;
  • Landlords’ intention to redevelop; and
  • Landlord’s intention to occupy.

The landlord and tenant can alternatively agree to “contract out” of the Security of Tenure provisions. If this process is followed, when the lease comes to its natural expiry, the tenant will have no automatic right to renew the tenancy. If the tenant wishes to remain at the property, they will have to negotiate a new lease with the landlord. 

Consultation

The consultation is looking to consider the pros and cons of the current “contracting-out” model and whether three alternative models could be more beneficial to business tenants and landlords.

No Security of Tenure – The tenant will have no security of tenure and the abolition of security of tenure provisions.

  • Pros: 
  1. This would provide landlords with certainty that the tenancy will expire at the end of the term:
  2. This will give freedom to the landlord to decide what they wish to do with the property after this;
  3. This may reduce the costs and time spent at the end of the term as tenants and landlords, as there is no statutory process to deal with.
  • Cons:
  1. This will offer a lot less protection for tenants than the current position and the alternatives; and
  2. This will grant the landlord significant strength when it comes to negotiating new terms at the end of the lease.

Opting in – “Contracting in” as opposed to the current position. The default position would be that the tenants do not have Security of Tenure. The landlord and tenant would have to opt in to the provisions so that the tenant does have Security of Tenure.

  • Pros:
  1. Landlords and tenants would have the flexibility to enter into leases with or without security provisions;
  2. Would remove the requirement to deal with the contracting-out provisions that are currently in force.
  • Cons:
  1. This will offer less protection for the tenants as they will have to negotiate a lease that opts in to the security provisions.

Mandatory Security for Tenants – Making Security of Tenure compulsory. The landlord and tenant would not be able to agree to contract-out of the provisions.

  • Pros:
  1. This position will provide tenants with the greatest level of protection and certainty when it comes to entering into a lease. The tenant will have the ultimate decision to remain at the end of the term.
  2. Less negotiation involved on leases because there would be no negotiation over whether there are Security of Tenure provisions.
  • Cons:
  1. This could weaken the landlord’s negotiating position when it comes to the end of the term.
  2. Landlord’s may look to offer very short term tenancies due to the mandatory Security of Tenure provisions.

Conclusion

While still in the consultation stage, it will be interesting to see how the reform progresses and what impact those reforms may have. It is hard to ignore that the options being considered will have impact on the strength of each parties position when it comes to negotiations between landlords and tenants. 

The Caw Commission’s consultation was closed on 19 February 2025. The Government will now consider the consultation and publish a second consultation paper. For more details, you can visit the Law Commission’s page on the consultation here.

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on the above topic, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com, or your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

banner services

News & Views

Lessons in Property Disputes: A Legal Examination of the £32.5M Mansion Case

Case Study

Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak v William Woodward-Fisher

Introduction              

Judgement has been handed down in the case of Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak (the Claimants) v William Woodward-Fisher (the Defendant) by a judge in the High Court on the 10 February 2025. The case concerned whether there was a misrepresentation in the Defendant’s replies to pre-contract enquiries in the sale of a property for £32,500,000.

Background

  • The property was substantially renovated by the Defendant during his ownership where he resided prior to the decision to sell the property.
  • In early 2018, the Defendant’s partner noticed a problem with moths within the house that had damaged expensive clothing.
  • The Defendant obtained quotes from two companies, one of which they employed for a treatment plan that commenced 5 March 2018. None of the initial treatments were successful.
  • The company returned and produced a report dated 15 May 2018 that stated the cause of the moths is likely to be an infestation within the natural wall insulation used at the property and that it would not be resolved until this was removed.
  • Sale of the property was agreed in February 2019 for £32,500,000 to the Claimants. The conveyancing process proceeded as normal  with exchange of contracts taking place 7 March 2019 and completion on the 2 May 2019.
  • The Claimant made numerous visits to the property prior to their offer to purchase and throughout the conveyancing process. They saw no moths during their visit.
  • Within days of moving in, the claimants noticed numerous moths in the property and  commissioned treatment at the property which resulted in a report that recorded a carpet moth infestation. Over the next few months, the Claimants employed several companies to deal with the moths at the property.
  • In September 2020, the claimants approached a company that advised them that they had carried out treatment at the property prior to their ownership.
  • The company provided the Claimant copies of the reports that they had shared with the Defendant, dated May and June 2018 in which they had identified the problem with the moth infestation as being the wool insulation in the property.
  • A claim was issued December 2021.

Summary

The Claimants alleged that the Defendant falsely answered their pre-contract enquiries and concealed a moth infestation of the insulation in the house. This induced the Claimants to buy the property for £32,500,000.

The Claimants sought an order for repayment of the purchase price with interest, damages for losses to which they had incurred in buying the house and trying to remedy the infestation.

There were three replies to the pre-contract enquiries that were found to be false. These were:

  1. The Defendant did not know of any vermin infestation in the house;
  2. Had not received any report on vermin infestation or on the fabric on the property, other than what had already been disclosed by the Defendant; and
  3. That the Defendant did not know of any hidden defect in the property.

The Defendant disputed that any misrepresentations were made and that the Claimants had not relied upon the replies to the pre-contract enquiries. The Defendant argued that the Claimants were barred from recission of the contract due to the fact that they had excessively delayed bringing their claim.

While the Claimants did not have direct knowledge of those replies, their solicitors did. The replies were provided along with a report on title and the Claimants were advised that there were no red flags and it was fine to proceed with the purchase. Therefore, the Claimants did rely upon the replies in buying the house.

The defendant had put forward three defences: delay, affirmation, and impossibility of restitution. The defences were based on the following:

  1. The Defendant contended that Claimants had known of the claim for misrepresentation from June 2020 or earlier and had not elected to rescind until May 2021, therefore causing delay;
  2. By  continuing to live in the property and carry out substantial works, improvements and renovations the Claimants had affirmed their purchase;
  3. Restitution was argued to have been impossible based on the fact the Defendant was unable to repay the purchase price as the Claimants had altered the property in such a way that it was not possible for them to give back the thing that he had sold them.
Delay:

The claim was delayed from October 2020 until May 2021, before the Claimants had made the election to rescind. The court considered that this was not sufficient based on the following:

  • The Claimants had not excessively delayed in bringing their claim;
  • The length of the delay had no particular consequence adversely or in favour of either party;
  • It was understandable the Claimants wanted to consider their rights and options before pursuing a claim for misrepresentation;
  • The Claimants sought advice from numerous experts before making their decisions. Such advice takes time.
Affirmation:

The defence of affirmation, amounts to, the Claimants having been taken to have made an irrevocable choice to treat the contract of sale as remaining in place through their actions or lack there off. The Defendant had argued that by the Claimants continuing to live in the property and carry out works, they had affirmed the transfer of legal title and contract.

Restitution:

The Defendant claimed he was not able to repay the purchase price so the title could not be re-transferred.

However, this was not what the Claimants were seeking; they were not proposing to sell the property back but to return the title with the protection of a lien or equitable charge in favour of the Claimants. This results in the effect of a legal mortgage, that will be redeemed when the Defendant sells the property. Rescission was not barred.

Held

The Claimants were awarded damages, including the stamp duty land tax and other costs paid on the purchase of the house and all costs incurred in seeking to eliminate the infestation.

The Claimants right to repayment will be protected by an equitable lien on the house in the meantime.

The Defendant was held to have known there was or may have been a serious infestation of moths requiring removal of the natural insulation in the house. The Defendant had received and read at least two reports from pest control companies dated 16 May 2018 and 25 June 2018, which informed his wife of the infestation and the need to remove the infested insulation.

The exact costs will be determined at a later hearing.

Practical Considerations / Conclusion

While this was a residential matter, it clearly outlines the importance of disclosure during the purchase and sale of a property, whether it is residential or commercial. A seller should ensure that the information provided in the pre-contract enquiries is clear, accurate, and reflects the position of the property and any potential issues during their ownership.

If unsure of whether something is relevant or must be provided to the buyer, you should raise it directly with your solicitor, however in any event the best course of action is to provide the buyer with all the information so that they can make an informed decision.

The court’s decision to rescind the contract shows the serious repercussions of misrepresentation being found in the conveyancing process.

If you have any questions and/or would like advice in relation to commercial property, please contact Tom Jones or your usual Dixcart contact on: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Understanding Commercial Rent Increase in the UK: What Landlords and Tenants Need to Know

Commercial Property Law

Commercial rent increase in the United Kingdom is critical for maintaining a fair balance between landlords and tenants, ensuring that rental agreements remain viable and reflective of market conditions. This guide outlines the key principles, legal framework, and practical considerations regarding rent increases in commercial property leases.

Common Types of Rent Review Mechanisms

  1. Fixed rent review:
    • Provides for a rent to increase by a fixed amount at the rent review date. An example would be an initial rent of £10,000 per annum for the first five years and then increasing to £15,000 per annum.
    • There could be more than one review depending on the agreement between the Landlord and Tenant and this could involve numerous increases in rent through the term.
  2. Indexed Rent Reviews:
    • Rent is adjusted in line with an inflation index, such as the Retail Prices Index (RPI), ensuring predictable increases over time. This generally involves multiplying the old rent by the relevant RPI increase since the date of the last review or commencement of the lease.
  3. Open Market Rent Reviews:
    • Rent is reviewed based on current market rates for similar properties, reflecting changes in demand and supply.
    • There could be a set minimum rent – an open market rent review could provide for a reduction in rent, so sometimes a lease will provide that the rent cannot go below a certain level (often the rent prior to the review).
    • Often, on each review date the parties will seek to agree upon a figure that is the equivalent to the open market rent for a similar premises. This is often done through negotiation between the Tenant and Landlord but can be done by way of notices and counter notices for the revised rent.
    • If agreement cannot be reached, the lease often provides that the parties should appoint an independent valuer who will determine the rent.
    • An open market rent review is often tied to an upwards only rent review or upwards/downwards rent review. 
  4. Upward-Only Rent Reviews:
    • Common in the UK, these clauses ensure that rent can only increase or remain the same, never decrease, regardless of market conditions.
    • As mentioned in the above, it can be an Open Market Upwards-Only Rent Review, which would mean rent is determined on the Open Market as above but can only increase the revised rent.
  5. Upwards/Downwards Rent Reviews:
    1. The annual rent will be revised in line with Open Market Rent determined in accordance with the Rent Review clause in the lease.
    1. In this case, the rent will reflect increases or decreases in rental since the start of the lease or the previous rent review.
  6. Turnover Rent Review:
    • The whole rent may be calculated as a percentage of the tenant’s annual turnover.
    • More commonly, the tenant pays a minimum base rent (perhaps 80% of the open market rent), plus an additional sum calculated by deducting the base rent from a fixed percentage of the annual turnover.
    • The tenant pays a much lower base rent, topped up by a higher percentage of the annual turnover.
    • The tenant pays a base rent which is only topped up if the annual turnover reaches a specified level.

Practical Considerations for Landlords and Tenants

  1. Understanding Lease Provisions:
    • Both parties should carefully review lease terms to understand the rent review process and obligations.
  2. Engaging Professional Valuers:
    • Independent valuers can provide expert assessments of market rents to guide negotiations and avoid disputes.
  3. Maintaining Communication:
    • Transparent communication helps foster amicable agreements and prevents misunderstandings during rent reviews.
  4. Preparing for Dispute Resolution:
    • In case of disagreement, parties should be prepared to use mediation, arbitration, or legal channels to resolve issues efficiently.

Emerging Trends

  • Impact of Economic Conditions:
    • Inflation and economic uncertainty are prompting landlords and tenants to reassess traditional rent review models.
  • Sustainability Considerations:
    • Green lease clauses and energy efficiency requirements are influencing rent negotiations and property valuations.
  • Post-Pandemic Adjustments:
    • The COVID-19 pandemic has led to greater scrutiny of rent levels and an attempt at forward planning. This has also included, where agreed, the incorporation of pandemic clauses in leases whereby rent can be suspended or reduced.

Conclusion

Understanding commercial rent increase provisions in the UK is essential for landlords and tenants to manage their obligations and rights effectively. By navigating the legal framework, engaging in clear communication, and staying informed about market trends, both parties can ensure fair and sustainable rental agreements that support their long-term interests.

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on the above topic, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Welcome Tom Jones to Dixcart Legal Limited

Corporate Tax Commercial Property Law

Dixcart Legal Limited is thrilled to introduce Tom Jones, a solicitor who recently joined our Commercial Property department. Tom brings a wealth of experience and a proven track record in commercial property law, making him a valuable asset to our team and our clients.

Tom has a robust background in commercial property law, complemented by his support to the Corporate Commercial department. His expertise spans various facets of commercial property, including negotiating and renewing commercial leases, bridging finance, development finance, property acquisitions and sales, corporate support, and property development.

Tom’s career began at a nationwide law firm where he completed his training and qualified as a solicitor in September 2020. Following this, he joined a law firm specialising in property development, representing a diverse array of clients such as corporate entities, national house builders, and developers. In this role, he provided comprehensive legal support for their projects, navigating the complexities of commercial property law with ease.

Subsequently, Tom furthered his career at a regional firm, where he honed his skills in commercial landlord and tenant matters, real estate finance, development finance, and corporate transactions involving real estate. His experience has made him adept at managing transactions from start to finish, ensuring that clients’ needs and goals are met efficiently and effectively.

At Dixcart Legal Limited, Tom plays a crucial role in assisting clients with their commercial leases, property acquisitions and sales, and various corporate commercial transactions. His commercially-minded approach and keen awareness of clients’ final goals in each transaction ensure that he provides practical and timely solutions tailored to their specific requirements.

Tom holds an LLB (Hons) and an LLM in Intellectual Property Law and Human Rights. His academic achievements and professional qualifications reflect his commitment to providing high-quality legal services.

Our Comprehensive Commercial Property Legal Services

At Dixcart Legal Limited, we offer a wide array of commercial property legal services, tailored to meet  your unique needs . Our experienced team is dedicated to providing top-tier legal advice and support throughout every stage of property transactions.

Property Acquisition and Disposition

Whether you are buying or selling commercial real estate, our team provides thorough guidance throughout the entire process. We ensure that all transactions are smooth, legally sound, and aligned with your commercial goals whatever they may be. From initial negotiations to final completions, we manage every aspect meticulously.

Due Diligence

Conducting thorough investigations is a cornerstone of our service. We identify potential risks and ensure that you can make informed decisions. Our due diligence process covers all necessary checks and balances, providing you with a comprehensive understanding of their prospective property transactions.

Contract Negotiation and Drafting

Our team excels in negotiating and drafting clear, enforceable agreements for the purchase and sale of properties. We ensure that all contractual terms are well-defined and aligned with your objectives, providing a solid foundation for their property dealings.

Lease Negotiations and Drafting

We specialise in crafting commercial leases that protect your interests and align with their business goals. Our services include negotiating favourable lease terms, drafting comprehensive lease agreements, and advising on renewals and terminations. We also handle licenses required under leases, whether for occupying or altering properties.

Representing the interests of both tenants and landlords, we negotiate favourable lease terms that ensure clarity and security. Our expertise covers all aspects of lease agreements, including renewal options and the legal implications of terminating leases.

Financing and Investment

Dixcart Legal Limited provides strategic counsel on financing options and investment structures, helping you secure the necessary funding. Our services include negotiating terms and drafting loan agreements for commercial real estate financing, as well as handling secured lending matters for development finance, refinancing, and investment finance.

Joint Ventures and Development Finance

We structure joint venture agreements to facilitate shared ownership and development projects. Securing finance for new developments requires meticulous planning and execution, and we work closely with you to understand your project needs. From loan agreements to security documentation, we cover all legal aspects to ensure smooth and efficient financing.

Corporate Transactions

Our expertise extends to providing comprehensive support for corporate transactions, ensuring seamless execution and optimal outcomes for you . We provide guidance through the complexities of mergers and acquisitions, conducting due diligence, title investigations, and lease negotiations where necessary.

Register of Overseas Entities

We assist overseas entities who wish to buy, sell, or transfer property or land in the UK. Our team handles all aspects of the registration process, including preparing and submitting necessary documentation, ensuring compliance with local laws and regulations, and liaising with foreign legal and governmental authorities.

Why Choose Us?

Choosing Dixcart Legal Limited means benefiting from our in-depth knowledge and experience in commercial property law. We offer personalised service, taking the time to understand your unique business goals and tailoring our services to meet your specific needs. Our commitment to efficiency ensures that the property transaction process is as smooth as possible, allowing you to focus on core business activities.

Tom Jones, alongside the rest of our Commercial Property team, is dedicated to providing top-tier legal support for all property-related matters. For more information, visit Dixcart UK or contact us at hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Legal Update June 2024: Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Commercial Real Estate in the UK

Property Commercial Property Law

The UK commercial real estate market is undergoing significant transformations driven by evolving economic conditions, legislative changes, and shifting business needs. For investors, landlords, and tenants, staying informed about these changes is crucial. This article provides a comprehensive update on recent legal developments in the UK commercial real estate sector, offering valuable insights for stakeholders looking to navigate this dynamic landscape effectively.

Recent Commercial Real Estate Legal Developments:

Lease Negotiations and Break Clauses

The pandemic has underscored the importance of flexible lease terms. Break clauses, which allow tenants to terminate leases early, have become a focal point in negotiations. Recent case law highlights the need for clear, precise wording in break clauses to avoid disputes.

Case Study: Capitol Park Leeds Plc v. Global Radio Services Ltd (2020)

Key Points:

  • Break Clause Conditions: The lease contained a break clause allowing the tenant to terminate the lease early, provided certain conditions were met, including giving notice by a specified date and a requirement to give vacant possession of the premises.
  • Tenant’s Compliance: Global Radio Services Ltd gave notice to break the lease but had stripped out certain elements of the property, including ceiling grids, lighting, and ventilation equipment. The landlord contended that in returning the property minus the stripped-out elements, the tenant had not complied with the condition to ‘give vacant possession of the premises’. The tenant argued that while it may be in breach of its repairing obligations under the lease and therefore liable for dilapidations, it nevertheless had given vacant possession.
  • Court’s Decision: The Court ruled in favour of the landlord, stating that the conditions of the break clause must be strictly adhered to. Accordingly, the tenant had not given the landlord vacant possession.

This case emphasises the importance of strict compliance with break clause conditions. Tenants must adhere to all stipulated requirements to exercise break options effectively.

Case Study: Ibrend Estates BV v NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd [2011] All ER (D) 117

Key Points:

  • Break Clause Conditions: Vacant possession was required, making it a condition precedent to exercising the break clause.
  • Tenant’s Compliance: The tenant terminated the lease by exercising their right under the break clause. The tenant had offered to vacate the premises but did not return the keys and had instructed their workmen to continue with repair and redecorating obligations after the relevant date for vacant possession. The tenant advised that it would have complied with any instructions to stop the work and leave the site and thus provide vacant possession.
  • Court’s Decision: It was held that the tenant maintained occupation and did not deliver vacant possession. They had continued to control access, via their security guard, to the site. The tenant had maintained its occupation in the same manner as it had before the end of the lease.

This case emphasises the importance of strictly adhering to lease conditions, particularly regarding the delivery of vacant possession as a condition precedent for exercising a break clause. The court’s decision underscores the necessity for lessees to fully comply with vacating procedures to avoid disputes and potential continuation of lease obligations.

Implications:

  • Strict Compliance: The rulings underscore the necessity for tenants to adhere strictly to all conditions in a break clause, regardless of the perceived significance of any obligations.
  • Negotiation: When discussing break clauses in your lease agreement, it is crucial to negotiate the terms. Specifically, consider changing the requirement for vacant possession to “free of occupation.” This adjustment can provide greater flexibility and reduce the risk of complications or disputes when exercising the break clause.
  • Attention to Detail: Both landlords and tenants should ensure all terms and conditions in lease agreements are clear and precise to avoid disputes.

Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, although granted royal assent on 24 May 2024 and thus becoming law, has yet to see most provisions come into effect and is not yet in force. We can reflect on the legislation and consider the provisions contained within.

This Act introduces significant changes, including prohibiting the grant or assignment of certain new long residential leases of houses. It amends tenants’ rights under long residential leases to acquire the freeholds of their houses, extend leases of their houses or flats, and collectively enfranchise or manage the buildings containing their flats. Additionally, it allows tenants to reduce their lease rent to a peppercorn and regulates the relationship between residential landlords and tenants, residential estate management, and rent charges. It also amends the Building Safety Act 2022 concerning the remediation of building defects and the insolvency of persons with repairing obligations for certain types of buildings. The current position is that the Act came into force partly on May 24, 2024, and was to be further enacted on July 24, 2024, and then fully effective on a date specified by the Secretary of State. Given that a General Election has now been called, we will need to see if this has any effect on the application of the Act.

The Act Empowers Leaseholders By:

  • Making it cheaper and easier for existing leaseholders of houses and flats to extend their lease or purchase their freehold.
  • Increasing the standard lease extension term from 90 years to 990 years for both houses and flats, with ground rent reduced to a peppercorn.
  • Eliminating the requirement for new leaseholders to have owned their house for two years before extending their lease or buying their freehold, and similarly for flats.
  • Increasing the 25% ‘non-residential’ limit to 50%, enabling leaseholders in buildings with up to 50% non-residential space to buy their freehold or manage their building.

Enhances Leaseholder Consumer Rights By:

  • Mandating greater transparency regarding service charges, with regular provision of key financial and non-financial information to leaseholders. This includes a standardized service charge demand form and an annual report to facilitate scrutiny and challenge unreasonable costs.
  • Replacing building insurance commissions for managing agents, landlords, and freeholders with transparent administration fees.
  • Eliminating the presumption that leaseholders must cover landlords’ legal costs when challenging poor practices.
  • Extending the same rights of redress to freehold homeowners on private and mixed tenure estates as leaseholders. This includes transparency over estate charges and the ability to challenge these charges through a Tribunal.

Update on Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES)

The Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) regulations are a critical part of the UK government’s efforts to enhance energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions in the building sector. These regulations set the minimum energy performance levels for commercial and residential properties that can be legally let.

Key Points:

  • Current Standards: Since April 2018, landlords have been prohibited from granting new leases (including renewals and extensions) on properties with an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating below ‘E’.
  • Recent Changes: As of April 1, 2023, MEES regulations were extended to cover all existing commercial leases. This means that all commercial properties must now have a minimum EPC rating of ‘E’ to be legally let, regardless of when the lease commenced.
  • Future Targets: The government aims to further tighten these standards, targeting a minimum EPC rating of ‘C’ by 2027 and ‘B’ by 2030. These targets align with the UK’s broader goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Practical Implications

For Landlords:

  • Lease Flexibility: Incorporate clear lease terms and break clauses to attract and retain tenants.
  • Sustainability Investments: Upgrade properties to meet MEES requirements and appeal to environmentally conscious tenants.
  • Compliance: Ensure that properties meet the minimum EPC rating requirements. Non-compliance can result in significant fines and restrictions on the ability to lease properties. Landlords may need to invest in energy efficiency improvements.

For Tenants:

  • Lease Negotiations: Negotiate favourable break clauses and rent concession terms. Be cautious of conditions attached to break clauses that you may not be able to comply with fully.
  • Clarity: Ensure awareness of any conditions attached to break clauses and comply with those when looking to exercise the break.
  • Energy Improving Works: Consider any landlord access provisions carefully, given the potential for business interruption.

Conclusion

The UK commercial real estate market is in a state of flux, driven by economic shifts, legislative changes, and emerging trends. For landlords, tenants, and investors, staying abreast of these developments is essential for making informed decisions and capitalising on opportunities. By understanding and adapting to the evolving commercial real estate legal landscape, stakeholders can navigate the complexities of the market and achieve sustainable success.

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any commercial real estate, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Registration of Overseas Entities with Companies House – The Story so Far

Commercial Property Law

According to HM Land Registry data in 2022 around 250,000 homes in England and Wales were owned by overseas nationals with another 92,640 properties being owned by overseas entities – valued in the region of well over £97 billion.

Property is not immune from the estimated £100 billion of criminal proceeds channelled through the UK.  Transparency International UK’s research previously identified more than £6.7 billion worth of UK property bought with “suspect” wealth. 

What has compulsory registration revealed so far?

We are almost six months past the deadline of the 31 January 2023 imposed by the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (the “ECTAE 2022”), so there will be more to follow, but the UK Government started to see some results. Billionaires, business figures, Conservative donors and Gulf Royals are amongst those identified as overseas beneficial owners of UK property.

Research from Transparency International UK suggests that almost 52,000 UK properties are still owned anonymously despite the requirements of ECTAE 2022. It is thought that the owners have either; ignored the law altogether, do not know about the new legal requirements, exploited loop holes or submitted information which makes it impossible for the public to find out who ultimately owns them.

Organisations are already calling on the Government and Companies House to put in further measures and close any loop-holes if the aims of ECTAE 2022 are to be realised.

What happens if you missed the deadline? 

Companies House made no announcement to extend the registration deadline beyond 31 January 2023.

Failure to register an overseas entity at Companies House has been recognised as a possibility by the Chief Registrar of HM Land Registry. The ECTAE Act 2022 placed a duty on HM Land Registry to enter a restriction in the register of a qualifying property, if the registrar is satisfied that an overseas entity is registered as proprietor of the estate and became registered as the proprietor in pursuance of an application made on or after 1 January 1999, even if it failed to register with Companies House. The effect of this  restriction is to prohibit the registration of any sale or disposal of the relevant property.

Whilst penalties and possible prison sentences for non-compliance are very much a threat, Companies House is prepared to take into consideration evidence of genuine attempts to comply with the registration obligation, such as appointing a UK regulated agent to verify and submit an application. 

Companies House goes a step further on its website by providing tips to overseas owners on how best to ensure an application is submitted correctly. 3 out of 10 filings were rejected, often because the information provided by the overseas entity (making the application directly) did not match the information provided by the agent.

Why is it important to comply if you have not already done so?

Until registered, an overseas entity is technically breaking the law and that comes with consequences as mentioned above. In addition, an overseas entity has a duty to ensure that the information they have submitted to the registrar remains accurate at all times. Any changes will need to be reported, at least annually. Failure to comply will result in penalties.

Overseas owners unable to properly dispose of their legal titles in property, may be tempted to dispose in other ways. Would be purchasers and new tenants should be cautious. Transferring a deposit, completion monies or receiving a reverse premium from or to a non-compliant overseas landlord may constitute proceeds of crime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Failure to check whether an overseas seller or landlord has registered with Companies House could inadvertently jeopardise a buyer or tenant for money laundering purposes.  Time will tell whether the Courts consider that a crime has been committed or a mere regulatory breach has taken place.

Do not forget, once registered the story does not end. Overseas entities will need to update their information on the register every year and Companies House is in the process of building a digital function to enable companies to do this easily. Hopefully an email reminder service will be set up soon to remind companies to file their annual update.

For more detail please see:

Register of Overseas Entities – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Updated guidance from UK Gov_register-an-overseas-entity

HM Land Registry practice-guide-78-overseas-companies-and-limited-liability-partnerships

Additional Information

If you have any questions or think you may need to register your overseas entity, please get in touch with Ben Habershon at: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Purchase of residential property in the UK

Commercial Property Law

Background

A prospective purchaser of property in the UK will ask what taxes they will encounter. One of the taxes is Stamp Duty Land Tax or shortly known as “SDLT” . You must pay SDLT if you buy a property or land over a certain price in England and Northern Ireland. The tax is different if the property or land is in Scotland or Wales.

In July 2020 the UK government published draft legislation that saw a 2% Stamp Duty Land Tax surcharge (“the surcharge”) being applied to purchases of residential property in England and Northern Ireland from 1 April 2021 by overseas buyers.   Also introduced was a new residency test linked to the timing of a transaction and dependent upon whether the purchaser is UK resident or non-resident.

The surcharge will not apply to commercial property.

So, how does it work?

The surcharge will be levied on top of all other SDLT payable, including the higher levels of SDLT introduced in April 2016 on second homes and buy-to-let purchases. Looking at this in simple terms:

Property value or lease (with over 21 years left to run) premium or transfer valueResidential property SDLT payable by UK residentsResidential SDLT assuming a second property (or more) – a surcharge of +3%Non-resident – a surcharge of +2%
£40,001 to £125,000zero3%5%
the next £125,001 – £250,0002%5%7%
the next £250,001 – £925,0005%8%10%
the next £925,001 – £1.5 million10%13%15%
the remaining portion above £1.5 million plus12%15%17%

To which non-UK residents will the rules apply?

There are a number of exclusions that apply and businesses with complex ownership structures will require careful consideration when assessing whether the surcharge applies.

At their simplest, the rules will apply to the following:

  • if the purchaser (or any one of the purchasers) is an individual outside the UK for at least 183 days out of 365-day period beginning 12 months before the transaction and ending 12 months after (in which case the surcharge is payable at the point of acquisition but a refund can be applied for);
  • certain unit trusts and Jersey Property Unit Trust, having regard to the status of the trustees;
  • a company not resident in the UK for corporation tax purposes;
  • a company that is resident in the UK for corporation tax purposes but is a close company and controlled by a non-UK resident individual(s) and is not a UK real estate investment vehicle nor group member of one, nor a Jersey property unit trust;
  • a partnership where one of the partners is treated as non-resident; and
  • where UK property is to be held in a trust, the residential status of the beneficiary is considered, failing which the residency tests are applied to the trustees themselves.

It is important to note, the surcharge will apply to a transaction where any one of the joint purchasers is non-UK resident. This applies to a spouse too. If buying jointly but one spouse works outside of the UK, the surcharge will apply.

Land transactions where contracts are exchanged before the 10 March 2020, but not completed or substantially performed until or after 1 April 2021, are likely to be subject to transitional rules

What is not covered?

The surcharge does not cover:

  • purchasers claiming multiple dwelling relief (requiring the purchase of no less than 6 dwellings).
  • overseas buyers buying off-plan who then “flip” the property onto a UK resident who enjoying sub-sale relief from the surcharge.

Further information

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any Commercial Property, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or to your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Overseas Investors Thinking of Investing in UK Real Estate

Commercial Property Law

CAN ANYONE INVEST IN UK REAL ESTATE EVEN WITHOUT A UK PASSPORT?

Yes.  Foreign individuals (over the age of 18) and corporate entities (subject to being registered at Companies House) may purchase or invest in UK real estate. 

WHAT TYPES OF INVESTMENT CAN BE MADE?

There are many ways to invest in UK real estate. Some of the more conventional routes in England and Wales include:

  • Ownership of a legal “estate” in land to realise capital appreciation

An estate is an abstract entity carried on from medieval times and used to describe nothing more than time in the land.  The most common forms of estate ownership are freehold (owning land in perpetuity or “forever”) and leasehold (owning land for a number of years). Generally a term of years in a lease of property will be born out of a freehold estate or a leasehold estate for a term longer than the one in question. The owner of a term of years in a leasehold interest will be a tenant.

  • Buy to let investments

A purchaser can acquire a freehold or leasehold interest (as above) specifically to rent it out to reap the rewards of a rental income. An investor will be looking closely for high net yields when deciding what to invest in and where.

  • Real Estate Investment Trust (or REIT)

Providing an easier and lower cost way to invest in  property, a UK REIT (often holding a portfolio of property) provides a way to invest in buy-to-let property without having to buy property directly.  UK REITs benefit from an exemption from UK tax on both rental income and gains relating to their property investment business allowing them to redistribute up to 90% of rental income to their shareholders.

  • Property development

This can take many forms. You might wish to buy land and sell it onto a developer having secured planning permission over it; buy an existing commercial building and apply for planning to convert it into residential property, convert adjoining houses into one large property and letting it out as a house with multiple occupation and so on. 

YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED A PROPERTY, WHAT NEXT?

Let the buyer beware

In the UK, a seller of  land has limited duties of disclosure to a purchaser because of the principle of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware).  In effect, a purchaser buys at its own risk. It is therefore important to instruct a property solicitor to carry out the usual pre-contract investigations on “title”, apply for the relevant searches and raise relevant enquiries of the seller. Careful investigation should minimise risk whilst flushing out any potential burdens and obligations that decrease value.

Site inspection

It is also advisable to carry out a site inspection and note any discrepancies between the plans and what is on the ground. You will also want to check for signs of the presence of occupiers,  rights of way and/or to carry out investigations such as soil samples in the event you intend to develop the land. Your professional advisor will be able to advise you further.

Who will hold “title” to the property?

This might be a corporate entity or an individual. Whenever land is held by two or more people concurrently there must be a trust. The legal title to the estate may be held by up to four persons as “joint tenants” on trust for the beneficial owners so that if any one of the legal owners dies, title to the estate passes to the survivor(s). Holding property as “tenants in common” however allows you to hold the legal interest on trust for the separate beneficiaries in equal or unequal shares as the case may be.

Finance

How will you finance the purchase and a potential deposit? Mortgages are difficult to come by in the UK for foreign investors.

Use of the property

Consider whether there are any restrictions on the use of the property.

Relocation to the UK

If you are intending on relocating to the UK, have you consulted with an immigration specialist to ensure all rules are complied with?

Tax considerations

It is advisable to speak to a professional as to the tax implications  of your impending purchase or look for tax efficient structures .

Further information

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any Commercial Property, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or to your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Heads of Terms

Hong Kong Commercial Property Law

In the middle of trying to agree Heads of Terms for a commercial property? Before you agree terms, consider this:

Many solicitors are first  instructed on a commercial property deal when agreed heads of terms (“HoTs”) land on their desk. 

What are HoTs and how can investing time in them before solicitors are instructed save a party time and money in the long run?

HoTs are a set of terms reflecting the negotiated position between the parties to aid the transaction to be documented.  

Often HoT’s are presented on an email against a series of bullet points,  far too short and lacking in detail. The solicitor then either expends a lot of time (and the client’s money) on taking instructions which invariably then require agreement by the other side, or interpreting the HoT’s and preparing the documents that then come back heavily amended.  Other times, HoT’s are so detailed, running into pages – they are in danger of becoming the document.      

Well thought out HoTs will be brief, set out the main terms and structure of a transaction, the timing of a transaction and identify any problem areas to be resolved. If the HoT’s are agreed between the parties, one solicitor can quickly get on and use the HoT’s to draft the documents whilst the other party’s solicitor will use the HoT’s as a checklist when reviewing the first drafts. 

Are HoT legally binding?

In short, maybe.

The general principle is clear, HoTs are not legally binding, even if you sign them. They merely evidence a serious intent and have moral force, but  do not legally compel the parties to conclude the deal on those terms. Points can therefore be revisited and renegotiated  (although confidentiality, exclusivity and costs provisions may be binding on the parties if that was the intention from the outset).

However, HoTs may easily become legally binding if they fall within Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. This could be catastrophic where the terms do not accurately reflect what the parties thought they had agreed.

Marking  HoT’s and any correspondence pertaining to them as  “subject to contract” means  they will not usually be treated as a legally binding agreement.

HoTs in contemplation of a new lease

On the 1 September 2020 the new Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (“RICS”) professional statement, Code for Leasing Business Premises, England and Wales 2020 (“the Code”)  took effect and encourages parties to new lease negotiations to adopt a collaborative approach.

The Code contains some mandatory requirements relating to HoTs that must be complied with by RICS agents or landlords that are RICS members or RICS regulated firms.  Part 4, Appendix A of the Code includes a useful optional template HoTs as well as a checklist for those who prefer to use their own form of HoTs. For more information see here:

Who should prepare HoT’s?

Any negotiating party can prepare draft HoT’s. They are usually prepare by a seller, landlord, charger, land owner etc and given to the other side to agree. Alternatively in large complex transactions, the prospective parties could be negotiating terms for a long time before someone collates all the information and prepares HoT’s . There really is no right way or wrong way. 

Whilst many will look to an agent to prepare HoT’s, it is advisable to engage a solicitor at the outset of negotiations particularly in contemplation of complex transactions so that gaps can be spotted and dealt with early on.

Further information

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any Commercial Property, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or to your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Considering a residential or business move to the UK? Read our practical guide to residential and commercial property in the UK

Commercial Property Law

Can foreigners buy property in the UK?

Yes. There is nothing stopping a non-UK resident individual or corporate body buying property in the UK (although an individual will need to be aged 18 years or above to own legal title to property and an overseas corporate entity must before acquiring a qualifying property firstly be registered at Companies House in compliance with the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022).

Other than the above, different laws apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland as opposed to property in England and Wales.  We will focus below on property located in England and Wales. If you intend to purchase property in Scotland or Northern Ireland, please seek independent advice from a specialist in those areas.

The below guidance is focused on property located in England and Wales.

How do you begin your property search?

There are a number of online property search engines. Traditionally agencies either specialise in commercial or residential property but not both.  Start with a search engine to compare properties in your chosen city or other location and get in touch with the local agent advertising the property to arrange a viewing. Negotiating price below the price advertised is common.

Why is it important to view a property?

Once you find a property it is important to see it, carry out the usual pre-contract searches against it (a property solicitor or registered conveyancer will be able to assist you) or ask a surveyor to view it.  

The principle of caveat emptor (“let the buyer beware”) applies at common law. A buyer alone is responsible for checking a property. To purchase without carrying out a viewing or survey will in most cases be at the entire risk of the buyer. Sellers will normally not provide warranties or indemnities as to the suitability of the property. 

How do you finance the purchase?

The estate agent and any professionals involved in the sale will be interested to know how you intend on financing the purchase. This could be with cash, but the majority of property purchased in England and Wales is through a mortgage/property loan. There are no restrictions on foreigners securing a UK mortgage to help finance a purchase although you might encounter stricter requirements, the obligation to pay a larger deposit and higher interest rates.

What type of legal “estate” to the property are you intending on buying?

Generally, property is either sold with freehold title (you possess it absolutely) or leasehold title (borne out of freehold property which you possess for a number of years) – both are estates in land. A number of other legal interests and beneficial interests also exist but these are not covered here.

His Majesty’s Land Registry holds a register of all legal titles. If your offer price is accepted your legal advisor will review the relevant register of legal title for that property to see if the property you are buying is being sold subject to any incumbrances. Pre-contract enquiries will also normally be raised with the seller to ensure there are no over-riding third party interests in the property that may not have been obvious from your site visit.

If more than one purchaser wants to own the property, how will that property be held?

The legal title to property can be held by up to four legal owners. 

There may be tax advantages or disadvantages to how you decide to hold property as legal owner and whether that is by individuals or corporate entities or a combination of both. It is important to take independent tax advice at an early stage. 

Where the property is intended to be held by co-owners, consider whether the legal title should be held by the co-owners as “joint tenants” (the beneficial ownership of each pass on death to the other co-owners) or as “tenants in common” (the beneficial share owned, passes on death to their estate or dealt with under their will).

What happens next?

You have found a property and your offer price has been accepted and you have decided who will hold the legal title to the property. What happens next?

You will need to instruct a solicitor or conveyancer to carry out the relevant due diligence, raise enquiries, carry out the usual pre-contract searches and advise you on potential tax liability. You will need to pass the usual “know your client” due diligence before the legal work gets underway so be prepared to locate the relevant documents needed for the usual money laundering and other checks.

When purchasing a freehold or leasehold subject to a premium, a contract is usually drafted and negotiated between the parties. Once it is agreed, the contract is “exchanged” at which point a deposit is paid to the seller’s solicitor (usually around 5 to 10% of the purchase price). Once a contract is exchanged both parties are bound to perform the contract (sell and buy) pursuant to the terms of the contract.  “Completion” of the transaction happens on a date set out in the contract and is typically a month later but can be sooner or much later, depending on whether the contract is subject to conditions being satisfied.

Upon completion of the transfer of freehold or long leasehold property, the balance of the purchase price will become payable. For new short leases of both commercial and residential properties, once the new lease is dated, the matter has completed and the landlord will send the new tenant an invoice for rent, service charges and insurance as per the terms of the lease.

The buyers’/tenants’ solicitor will need to make an application to His Majesty’s Land Registry to register the transfer/new lease. The legal title will not pass until the registration is complete. 

What taxes need to be considered when taking a leasehold title or a freehold title?

The tax treatment from owning a freehold or leasehold in the UK will largely be dependent on why the individual or corporate entity holds the property.  A purchaser may buy or lease a property to reside in, occupy premises to conduct their own trade from, own to develop in order to realise a rental income or buy as an investment to develop and sell on for a profit.  Different taxes apply at each stage so it is important to speak with a tax specialist early on, depending on what plans you have for the property. 

One tax that is payable within 14 days of completion of a lease or property transfer in England  (unless one of the limited reliefs or an exemption applies) is stamp duty land tax (“SDLT”).

For residential properties see the following rates below. However, a surcharge of an additional 3% is payable on top if the purchaser already owns property elsewhere:

Property or lease premium or transfer valueSDLT rate
Up to £250,000Zero
The next £675,000 (the portion from £250,001 to £925,000)5%
The next £575,000 (the portion from £925,001 to £1.5 million)10%
The remaining amount (the portion above £1.5 million)12%

When buying a new leasehold property, any premium will be subject to tax under the above. However, if the total rent over the life of the lease (known as the ‘net present value’) is more than the SDLT threshold (currently £250,000), you’ll pay SDLT at 1% on the portion over £250,000. This does not apply to existing (‘assigned’) leases.

If you’re not present in the UK for at least 183 days (6 months) during the 12 months before your purchase, you are ‘not a UK resident’ for the purposes of SDLT. You will usually pay a 2% surcharge if you’re buying a residential property in England or Northern Ireland. For more information on this, please read our article: Overseas buyers thinking of purchasing a residential property in England or Northern Ireland in 2021?

On commercial property or mixed-use property, you will pay SDLT on increasing portions of the property price when you pay £150,000 or more. For a freehold transfer of commercial land, you will pay SDLT at the following rates:

Property or lease premium or transfer valueSDLT rate
Up to £150,000Zero
The next £100,000 (the portion from £150,001 to £250,000)2%
The remaining amount (the portion above £250,000)5%

When you buy a new non-residential or mixed use leasehold property you pay SDLT on both the purchase price of the lease and purchase price of the lease and the value of the annual rent you pay (the ‘net present value’). These are calculated separately then added together. The above referred to surcharges also apply.

Your tax professional or lawyer will be able to calculate your SDLT liability according to the rates that apply at the time of your purchase or lease.

Other useful links:

For more information please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Register of Overseas Entities – A Further Update (March 2023)

Commercial Property Law

Background

According to HM Land Registry data in 2022 around 250,000 homes in England and Wales were owned by overseas nationals with another 92, 640 properties being owned by overseas entities – valued in the region of well over £97 billion.

Property is not immune from the estimated £100 billion of criminal proceeds channelled through the UK.  Transparency International UK’s research previously identified more than £6.7 billion worth of UK property bought with “suspect” wealth. 

What has compulsory registration revealed so far?

We are about two months past the deadline of the 31 January 2023 imposed by the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (the “ECTAE 2022”), so there will be more to follow, but the UK Government has started to see some results. Billionaires, business figures, Conservative donors and Gulf Royals are amongst those identified as overseas beneficial owners of UK property.

Research from Transparency International UK suggests that almost 52,000 UK properties are still owned anonymously despite the requirements of ECTAE 2022. It is thought that the owners have either; ignored the law altogether, do not know about the new legal requirements, exploited loop holes or submitted information which makes it impossible for the public to find out who ultimately owns them.

Organisations are already calling on the Government and Companies House to put in further measures and close any loop-holes if the aims of ECTAE 2022 are to be realised.

What happens if you missed the deadline? 

Companies House made no announcement to extend the registration deadline beyond 31 January 2023.

Failure to register has been recognised as a possibility by the Chief Registrar of HM Land Registry. The ECTAE Act 2022 placed a duty on HM Land Registry to enter a restriction in the register of a qualifying property, if the registrar is satisfied that an overseas entity is registered as proprietor of the estate and became registered as the proprietor in pursuance of an application made on or after 1 January 1999, even if it failed to register with Companies House. The effect of this  restriction is to prohibit the registration of any sale or disposal of the relevant property.

Whilst penalties and possible prison sentences for non-compliance are very much a threat, Companies House is prepared to take into consideration evidence of genuine attempts to comply with the registration obligation, such as appointing a UK regulated agent to verify and submit an application. 

Companies House goes a step further on its website by providing tips to overseas owners on how best to ensure an application is submitted correctly. 3 out of 10 filings were rejected, often because the information provided by the overseas entity (making the application directly) did not match the information provided by the agent.

Why is it important to comply if you have not already done so?

Until registered, an overseas entity is technically breaking the law and that comes with consequences as mentioned above. In addition, an overseas entity has a duty to ensure that the information they have submitted to the registrar remains accurate at all times. Any changes will need to be reported, at least annually. Failure to comply will result in penalties.

Overseas owners unable to properly dispose of their legal titles in property, may be tempted to dispose in other ways. Would be purchasers and new tenants should be cautious. Transferring a deposit, completion monies or receiving a reverse premium from or to a non-compliant overseas landlord may constitute proceeds of crime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Failure to check whether an overseas seller or landlord has registered with Companies House could inadvertently jeopardise a buyer or tenant for money laundering purposes.  Time will tell whether the Courts consider that a crime has been committed or a mere regulatory breach has taken place.

For more detail please see:

Register of Overseas Entities – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Updated guidance from UK Gov_register-an-overseas-entity

HM Land Registry practice-guide-78-overseas-companies-and-limited-liability-partnerships

https://www.transparency.org.uk/uk-register-overseas-entities-through-the-keyhole

Additional Information

If you have any questions or think you may need to register your overseas entity, please get in touch with Ben Habershon at: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Update on Companies House Register of Overseas Entities with Property Interests in the UK

Commercial Property Law

The deadline of 31 January 2023, for the registration of overseas entities with property interests in the UK, with Companies House has now past. An estimated 13,000 relevant overseas entities had not registered by the deadline, approximately 40% of the total. 

Considerable work needs to be committed to the verification process, before an application for registration can be made.  

In addition, overseas entities that owned a qualifying estate on February 28, 2022 and have subsequently disposed of their interest, are also caught by the rules.

Following the introduction of the  Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) 2022 Act (“ECTE ACT”) which came into force on 01 August 2022 the UK Government is now seeking further measures with the introduction of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill which is already past Committee stage in the House of Commons.  The register of overseas entities will be amended to maintain consistency with changes intended to the Companies Act 2006. Amongst the other far reaching and significant changes intended by the Bill are:

  • reforms to Companies House including the introduction of identity verification for all new and existing registered company directors
  • reforms to prevent the abuse of limited partnerships by tightening registration requirements and increasing transparency
  • additional powers to seize and recover suspected criminal cryptoassets by boosting criminal confiscation powers
  • reforms to give businesses more confidence to share information in order to tackle money laundering and other economic crime
  • new intelligence gathering powers for law enforcement and removal of nugatory burdens on business.

If you have any questions or think you may need to register your overseas entity, please get in touch with Ben Habershon at: hello@dixcartuk.com.

For further information please see our previous article here

See also: https://companieshouse.blog.gov.uk/2022 and https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3339


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Register of Overseas Entities: A Comprehensive Guide to the new Registration Requirements for Overseas Owners of UK Property

Commercial Property Law

Register of Overseas Entities – Time to take action now

Since the introduction of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 earlier this year, we have been waiting for signs of when the new Register of Overseas Entities would be introduced.

The government have announced that the new register of overseas entities (ROE) will come into force at 9am on 01 August 2022.

As criminal offences may be committed for non-compliance with the requirement for overseas entities to register certain details (including those of the beneficial owners) to Companies House, it is time to take action now. 

Below we explain what has changed, who you need to identify, what information is required to enable you to register and how we can help you.

What has changed since the enactment of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022?

The three new statutory instruments have been introduced:

  1. The Register of Overseas Entities (VPI) Regs 2022
  2. The Land Registration (Amendment) Rules 2022
  3. The Register of Overseas Entities (Delivery, Protection and Trust Services) Regulations 2022

In essence, an overseas entity will need to gather evidence and information required under the 2022 Act and forward this to an independent verification officer in the UK. The verification officer will then submit an application to Companies House to add the relevant entity to the register which will generate a unique Overseas Entity ID code.

Who needs to register?

The beneficial owner of any overseas entity (being a corporate body, partnership or other legal person) governed by the laws of a country or territory outside of the United Kingdom that owns, leases or disposes of qualifying real estate.

For the purposes of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 a beneficial owner could be:  

IndividualLegal Entity Body Corporate  Government/Public body and others
A person (“X”) is a “beneficial owner” of an overseas entity or other legal entity (“Y”) if one or more of the following conditions are met (within Part 2 Sch 2):

In addition to items 1 to 4 in the last column, a legal entity is a registerable beneficial owner if it is subject to its own disclosure requirements.  Part 3 Sch 2 lists these as:A government or public authority is a “registrable beneficial owner” in relation to an overseas entity in all cases where it is a beneficial owner of the entity and:
1. X holds, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting rights in Y

2. X holds the right, directly or indirectly, to appoint or remove a majority of the board of directors of Y

3. X has the right to exercise, or actually exercises, significant influence or control over Y

4. Trusts:

(a) the trustees of a trust, or the members of a partnership, unincorporated association or other entity, that is not a legal person under the law by which it is governed meet any of the conditions specified above (in their capacity as such) in relation to Y, and

(b) X has the right to exercise, or actually exercises, significant influence or control over the activities of that trust or entity.






a) Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 applies to it (whether by virtue of section 790B of that Act or another enactment that extends the application of that Part),

b) it is a company to which section 790C(7)(b) of that Act applies (companies with voting shares traded on UK or EU regulated markets),

c) it is of a description specified in regulations under section 790B(1)(b) or 790C(7)(d) of that Act (or under either of those sections as extended),

d) it is an eligible Scottish partnership within the meaning of regulation 3 of the Scottish Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/694),

e) it is registered in the register of overseas entities under this Part of this Act, or

f) it is of a description specified by the Secretary of State in regulations under this paragraph
Is a beneficial owner within Part 2 Sch 2 (see the first column).

Trusts

In respect of any registerable beneficial owner who is a trustee information will need to be provided about the trust itself.


















Is not exempt from registration pursuant to Part 4 of Sch 2 deals with a limited number of exemptions.Is not exempt from registration: See first column.
(Part 5 of Sch 2 provides further supplementary provisions for the interpretation of Schedule 2).

What are the timelines from when the register goes live?

  • Overseas entities who already own qualifying property in the UK (excluding Northern Ireland where different rules apply) acquired at any time on or after 1 January 1999 will have 6 months from the date the register becomes live to register with Companies House.  
  • Overseas entities acquiring freehold property or a lease granted for 7 years or more in the UK will be required to register with Companies House as soon as the register becomes live.
  • Overseas entities that have disposed of qualifying property (by sale of a freehold or the grant or assignment of a lease with 7 or more years in term or the grant of a legal charge) between 28 February 2022 and 6 months from the date the register goes live.

What information is required before registration can take place at Companies House?

Schedule 1 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 sets out the required information needed in order to register the beneficial interest at Companies House as per the below table:

Individual (being those who meet the thresholds for control or ownership as above)Legal Entity body corporateGovernment/Public body and others
(a) Name, date of birth and nationality;

(b) usual residential address;

(c) a service address;

(d )the date on which the individual became a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity;

(e) which of the conditions in paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 is met in relation to the registrable beneficial owner (see the table above)

(f) whether the individual meets that condition by virtue of being a trustee;

(g) whether the individual is a designated person (persons so named by Ministers or under UN Security Council Resolutions within the meaning of section 9(2) of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018), where that information is publicly available.












(a) Name;

(b) country of incorporation or formation;

(c) registered or principal office;

(d) a service address;

(e) an email address;

(f) the legal form of the entity and the law by which it is governed;

(g) any public register in which it is entered and, if applicable, its registration number in that register (in the country in which the overseas entity was incorporated or formed).

And also:

(h) the date on which the entity became a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity;

(i) which of the conditions in paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 is met in relation to the registrable beneficial owner and a statement as to why that condition is met;

(j) whether the entity meets that condition by virtue of being a trustee; and

(k) whether the entity is a designated person (persons so named by Ministers or under UN Security Council Resolutions within the meaning of section 9(2) of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018), where that information is publicly available.
(a) Name;

(b) principal office;

(c) a service address;

(d) its legal form and the law by which it is governed;

(e) the date on which the entity became a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity;

(f) which of the conditions in paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 is met in relation to the registrable beneficial owner and a statement as to why that condition is met; and

(g) whether the entity is a designated person (within the meaning of section 9(2) of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018), where that information is publicly available.  

Trusts

(a) The name of the trust or, if it does not have a name, a description by which it may be identified;

(b) the date on which the trust was created;

(c) in relation to each person who has at any time been a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity by virtue of being a trustee of the trust—
(i) the person’s name,
(ii) the date on which the person became a registrable beneficial owner in that capacity, and
(iii) if relevant, the date on which the person ceased to be a registrable beneficial owner in that capacity; (d) in relation to each beneficiary under the trust, the information that would be required for individuals or other legal entities if the beneficiary were a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity;

(e) in relation to each settlor or grantor, the information that would be required for individuals or other legal entities if the settlor or grantor were a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity;

(f) in relation to any person who, under the terms of the trust, has rights in respect of (a) the appointment or removal of trustees, or (b) the exercise by the trustees of their functions: (i) the information that would be required for individuals or other legal entities if the interested person were a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity, and (ii) the date on which the person became an interested person.
Dispositions (within the meaning given in section 41 (4) of the 2022 Act) between 28 February 2022 and 6 months after the register becomes live? 

In addition to the above Section 41 of the 2022 Act  must be complied which includes the delivery of the following information:

a) the date of disposition, and

b) the registered title number of the qualifying estate;

c) the date of delivery of the deed,

d) the title number of the title sheet in which the entity’s interest is entered.
Dispositions (within the meaning given in section 41 (4) of the 2022 Act) between 28 February 2022 and 6 months after the register becomes live? 
 
The same information as with individuals is required here.








Dispositions (within the meaning given in section 41 (4) of the 2022 Act) between 28 February 2022 and 6 months after the register becomes live? 

The same information as with individuals is required here.










An overseas entity may give an information notice to any person that it knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the entity.

The notice will require the person to whom it is given to state whether or not they are a registerable beneficial owner (and then provide the information above). The overseas entity may also give a person an information notice if it knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the person knows the identity of a person who is a registrable beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity, any other beneficial owner in relation to the overseas entity, a person likely to have knowledge of the identity of a person falling into either of the first two categories.

It is an offence for the person served either notice not to; respond or to give false or make reckless statements. The person, subject to a summary conviction may face subsequent imprisonment.

The Secretary of State also has powers to require an overseas entity to apply for registration within a period of 6 months of the date of the notice. Again, sanctions apply for non-compliance.

In addition to the above, the overseas entity must also deliver one of the following three statements regarding its registerable beneficial owner and provide the relevant evidence to back up the statement as follows:

StatementFurther Information Required
1




(a) That the entity has identified one or more registrable beneficial owners and that it has no reasonable cause to believe there are others and (b) that the entity is able to provide the required information about each registrable beneficial owner it has identified.  

1. The required information about the entity (see above table).  

2. The required information about each registrable beneficial owner that the entity has identified.
2



A statement that the entity has no reasonable cause to believe that it has any registrable beneficial owners.


1. The required information about the entity (as above).
 
2. The required information about each managing officer (see below) of the entity.
3






(a) That the entity has reasonable cause to believe that there is at least one registrable beneficial owner that it has not identified,

(b) that the entity is not able to provide the required information about one or more of the registrable beneficial owners it has identified, or

(c) that paragraphs (a) and (b) both apply.  


1. The required information about the entity (as above).
 
2. The required information about each managing officer (see below) of the entity.
 
3. The required information about each registrable beneficial owner that the entity has identified or so much of that information as it has been able to obtain.
Trusts: Where an entity discloses that a registrable beneficial owner is a trustee then the application must also include:    







(a) The required information about the trust or so much of that information as the overseas entity has been able to obtain, and

(b) a statement as to whether the entity has any reasonable cause to believe that there is required information about the trust that it has not been able to obtain; and

(c) trust beneficiaries also need to be disclosed, together with their names, dates of birth, nationality, residential address and service address (if a legal entity other than an individual).

If either statement 2 or 3 above applies, then further information is required as to the “managing officer” (a director, manager, secretary). Part 4 of Sch 1 of the 2022 Act requires the additional following information to be provided in relation to the managing officer:

IndividualsNon-individuals (including public bodies)
(a) Name, date of birth and nationality;

(b) any former name (unless changed aged 16 or below or greater than 20 years ago);

(c) usual residential address;

(d) a service address (which may be stated as the entity’s registered or principal office);

(e) business occupation (if any); and

(f) a description of the officer’s roles and responsibilities in relation to the entity.    
(a) Name;

(b) registered or principal office;

(c) a service address;

(d) the legal form of the entity and the law by which it is governed;

(e) any public register in which it is entered and, if applicable, its registration number in that register;

(f) a description of the officer’s roles and responsibilities in relation to the entity; and

(g) the name and contact details of an individual who may be contacted about the managing officer.

Who submits the information and how?

The register will be a digital service with information to be submitted in English.

Before any application for first registration or later updating applications/rectifications and amendments can take place, the information above will be subject to formal verification by a relevant person (being one falling within section 3 and 8 of The Money Laundering Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017). Broadly, a relevant person will include an independent legal professional, financial institutions, auditors, estate agents, auction platforms etc. 

Once the information has been verified the relevant person will need to confirm to the  Companies House Registrar that it has completed verification in accordance with the new Act and regulations and provide a  statement complying with Part 2 (5) of The Register of Overseas Entities (VPI) Regulations 2022.  If the relevant entity has made no relevant dispositions between 28 February 2022 and the date the application is made, the application must state this.

The information itself is to be retained by the relevant person for a period of 5 years.

What happens once registration is accepted?

Companies House will then publish the identity on a public register and assign a unique Overseas Entity ID. The name of the relevant entity and their agent will be available to the public on the Companies House website. The Overseas Entity ID will be required by the Land Registry before it registers any dealings with real estate in England & Wales.

The 2022 Act requires registered entities to update their information annually.

Secondary legislation allows individuals to be able to protect some of their information from public disclosure in limited circumstances (if it can be shown an individual or the people they reside with will be at serious risk of violence or intimidation).

Failure to comply with registration and/or within the time limits imposed?

In England and Wales a person guilty of an offence is liable on summary conviction to a daily fine of up to £2,500 or unlimited fines and a prison sentence of up to 5 years. Failure to register will also prevent any dealings with the real estate in question.

What can we do to help you?

We appreciate the above information is a bit of a mine-field especially as we are expecting further amendments to the legislation in the next few weeks.

We can keep you up to date of the latest developments, assist and advise you on your obligations and aid in collecting the required information. If you require, we can also verify the required information for you and make the application for registration to Companies House and communicate the unique Overseas Entity ID number to you as well as process annual returns.

Additional information

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on the UK public register of beneficial ownership of overseas entities, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Overseas entity with property assets in the UK, or intending to buy? Here is what you need to know.

Residential property in England Commercial Property Law

Five years have passed since the UK government set out its intention to create a public register of the beneficial ownership of “overseas entities’” UK assets – progress was slow to say the least with Brexit and then the pandemic slowing progress further.  The recent invasion of the Ukraine by Russia saw the government expedite that intention and the new  Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act  2022 (“the ECA”) received royal assent on the 15 March 2022.

What is an “overseas entity”?

To understand the ECA we need to understand that it is an addition to a raft of historical measures seeking to impose financial or coercive measures on overseas legal entities to identify, control, change or stop them from behaving criminally. The ECA seeks to identify the ultimate foreign beneficial owner(s) on a public register even if that owner tries to hide behind a complex structure of shell companies.

Any corporate body including a partnership that is governed by the law of a country or a territory outside of the United Kingdom will be caught under the new rules. This will include  those holding more than 25% of the shares or voting rights in the entity. If this test cannot be satisfied then the ECA looks to any beneficial foreign owner who nonetheless exercises significant control over the relevant entity (or has the right to do so), including those with the right to remove (or appoint) a majority of the board of directors.

What does the new ECA do and when will you need to comply by?

There are three main parts to the ECA:

Part 1  – establishes a new register of foreign owners of UK property, which will be held at Companies House and will be retrospective, in that it will (subject to a few limited exceptions) include all property purchases in England & Wales since 1999 (2014 for Scotland). 

Foreigners looking to buy UK property will have 6 months, from the date of acquisition of freehold or leasehold land with over 7 years to run, to comply with the new rules. 

In practice, it is unlikely the Land Registry will register an overseas entity as owner of a UK property until it has registered its beneficial ownership at Companies House first. 

Those  who already own UK property will have six months from the date of the ECA’s commencement to either apply for registration or dispose of their property.  However, overseas entities trying to sell their UK property to get around the new rules, will not be allowed to without being registered first. Would-be sellers of property between 28 February 2022 and the date of full implementation of the new register are obliged to submit their details for registration.

Part 2 –  makes wide ranging amendments to powers under the unexplained wealth order (or UWO) regime –  a mechanism designed to confiscate the proceeds of crime, using civil rather than criminal powers pursuant to section 1 of the Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA 2017). This includes giving authorities the ability to apply for interim freezing orders.

Part 3 – strengthens provisions about sanctions. Fines of up to £2,500 per day can be levied against those who break the new rules, including criminal penalties for non-compliance of up to 5 years.  Even where no monetary fine is imposed, the Office of Financial Sanctions will be empowered to publicly identify companies and individuals that it suspects to have breached financial sanction rules.

Further guidance and action

Bearing in mind the speed at which the UK government rushed the ECA through,  further guidance from government and regulators regarding how and when entities should report is expected imminently. 

In practical terms there is a lot to do and only time will tell whether Companies House and the Land Registry will cope with the deluge of applications.

To learn more, please see

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/10/contents/enacted

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-measures-to-tackle-corrupt-elites-and-dirty-money-become-law

Additional information

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any Commercial Property, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or to your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...

banner services

News & Views

Rent arrears building up over the pandemic? Is there help?

Commercial Property Law

The impact of the pandemic has devastated commercial sectors following mandated government closures. Landlords and tenants alike have suffered. Research by property specialists Remit Consulting revealed that the estimated rent shortfall to landlords was in the region of £6.4bn between March 2020 and the June 2021 quarter in England alone.

The UK Government was to announce further measures to help parties deal with the arrears of commercial rents accrued due to the pandemic. Well, that announcement came in November 2021 and a new Code of Practice for Commercial Property (the “Code”) was introduced.  Pending the introduction of the new arbitration process due to come into force on or around the 25 March 2022 (see below) the new Code provides parties with a clear process for settling outstanding debts.

What is the Code and what does it seek to achieve?

  • It is important to remember the legal position remains, a tenant is liable under the covenants of its lease.  The Code is meant as a  “best practice guide” to assist in negotiations to enable viable businesses to survive and applies to all commercial leases where businesses have accrued commercial rent debts since March 2020.
  • Tenants unable to pay in full should negotiate with their landlord in the expectation that the landlord waives some or all rent arrears where they are able to do so.
  • However, where it is affordable, a tenant should aim to meet their obligations under their lease in full. Any relief given by a landlord should be no greater than necessary.
  • The preservation of the tenant business viability should not come at the expense of the landlord’s solvency – however tenants should not have to take on more debt or restructure their business in order to pay their rent. A balance needs to be achieved.
  • Where a landlord and tenant are unable to reach agreement by negotiation, they may be able to apply for the proposed new binding arbitration process (see below).

What’s new for 2022?

The Code is voluntary, no landlord or tenant will be forced to comply. So the Government presented the Commercial rent (Coronavirus) Bill which is expected to become law on or before the 25 March 2022.  This will introduce a system of binding arbitration building upon the Code.

The new act will apply to rents accruing between 21 March 2020 and (likely the) 18 July 2021 and apply to business premises that were mandated to close by the Government but limited to leases that fall into Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

Ring-fenced debt within the scope of the process will be temporarily immune from some legal remedies sought by landlords (extending to those currently unavailable under the Coronavirus Act 2020).

The act proposes that either party may make a  reference to arbitration that must include a formal proposal for resolving the matter supported by evidence. The  counterparty then has  14 days to submit its own proposal. The arbitrator will have up to 14 days from a hearing, or as soon as reasonably practicable if not, to consider the evidence and come to a decision which will be legally binding.

More on the new act once it is legislated.

For further information and detail please refer to: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/commercial-rents-code-of-practice-november-2021 and https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3064

If you have any questions and/or would like advice on any Commercial Property, please contact us at: hello@dixcartuk.com or to your usual Dixcart contact.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Property Law
Legal Update March 2025  

The Law Commission has published its consultation paper examining the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954...