banner services

News & Views

Changes to Companies House fees

Commercial Law

From 1st May 2024, Companies House will be increasing its filing fees for various services as part of its broader initiative to improve the integrity of the UK registry under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act.

According to Companies House, these changes are intended to help facilitate the expansion of digital services provided by Companies House, increase the accuracy of information on the register and further protect against economic crime. It is important that businesses are aware of the key changes and manage their costs accordingly to ensure continued compliance with regulations.

Set out below are the main changes affecting company incorporation and the registration of overseas entities. For a complete list of fee changes please visit the GOV.UK website.

Key Incorporation and Registration fees:

TransactionOld feeNew fee
Incorporation£12£50
Change of name£8£30
Confirmation statements£13£34
Re-registration£20£71

Key filing fees for the Register of Overseas Entities:

TransactionOld feeNew fee
Registration of an overseas entity£100£234
Update fee£120£234
Application for removal£400£706

These changes represent a significant increase in costs, particularly regarding Overseas Entities. If you have any concerns or require assistance with registration or any of the above, contact us via email at hello@dixcartuk.com.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Legal Commercial Law
Non-competition clauses in commercial contracts

It is common for contracts between businesses to contain provisions that are aimed at preventing one of the parties from competing against the other (often called “restraint of trade” clauses). […]

banner services

News & Views

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – The Proposed Changes to Companies House Explained

Commercial Law

What is the purpose of the Act and who will it affect?

On 26th October 2023 the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) passed into UK law, marking the most significant change to Companies House since its inception. Its leading principle is that Companies House will be afforded greater powers in a bid to tackle economic and financial crime and address other abuses of the register.

The changes will bring added responsibilities for new and existing directors, persons of significant control (PSCs) and any agents who file on behalf of a company, as Companies House will be able to impose sanctions for incorrect or misleading information, or if the company fails to comply with the new registration requirements.

Companies House plans to introduce measures from March 2024 onwards affecting the following entities:

  • private limited companies
  • public limited companies (PLCs)
  • limited liability partnerships (LLPs)
  • limited partnerships (LPs)
  • community interest companies (CICs)
  • overseas companies

Companies House published guidance in its blog on 22 January 2024 regarding the first set of changes coming into effect on 4 March 2024: Get ready for changes to UK company law – Companies House (blog.gov.uk)

What are the changes?

  1. Confirmation statements and registered office addresses – from March 2024

Every company, including dormant and non-trading companies, will need to file a confirmation statement at least once a year, even if there have been no changes during the review period.

Furthermore, to ensure information on the register is accurate and up-to-date, companies will need to provide an appropriate address for the registered office to which correspondence will be received by a representative of the company. Companies will no longer be able to use a PO box as a registered office address, and Companies House will have powers to query and challenge addresses it believes to be inaccurate and, more widely, information it suspects to be incorrect. The enforcement tools at its disposal include:

  • Financial penalties
  • An annotation on the company’s record
  • Prosecution
  • Strike companies off the register
  1. Statement of lawful purposes – from March 2024

When incorporating or registering a company, subscribers of that company will be asked to provide a statement confirming that the purpose of formation is for a lawful purpose, and that future activities will also be lawful.

  1. Identity verification – date of introduction TBC

Another significant change is the future introduction of identity verification for all PSCs and directors of a company, including companies already on the register. To deter those setting up companies for illegal purposes, verification will need to be done either directly with Companies House or by using an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP), such as solicitors or accountants. For LPs, this must be done solely through ACSPs to ensure that information is from a trustworthy source.

Companies House has confirmed there is not yet a date of introduction and more information is to follow. For PSCs and directors of existing companies, there will be a transition period once introduced to allow reasonable time for adjustment to the new requirements.

Dixcart Legal is an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP) and can assist with verification.

  1. Higher fees – date of introduction TBC

Companies House fees will be increasing in 2024 to cover the costs of the enforcement powers, although we await further guidance on what these fees will be.

  1. Software-only filing – date of introduction TBC

Over the next 2 – 3 years, Companies House plans to shift towards a system of filing by software-only, applying to directors who file accounts themselves as well as third party agents like solicitors.

  1. “Failure to Prevent Fraud”

Significantly, the ECCTA includes a new criminal offence which makes companies and partnerships liable for failing to prevent fraud by employees or representatives for the benefit of the organisation. Those who hold a position within the organisation of “senior manager” or higher will be liable for conviction if an economic crime is committed.

Further guidance is expected from Companies House as to when we can expect all measures to be implemented and updates will be released accordingly. For additional details see the gov.uk website.

For more information from us, or if you wish to discuss using an ASCP, please use our Enquiry form or email us at hello@dixcartuk.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Law
Changes to Companies House fees

From 1st May 2024, Companies House will be increasing its filing fees for various services as part of its broader initiative to improve the integrity of the UK registry under […]

Legal Commercial Law
Non-competition clauses in commercial contracts

It is common for contracts between businesses to contain provisions that are aimed at preventing one of the parties from competing against the other (often called “restraint of trade” clauses). […]

banner services

News & Views

Non-competition clauses in commercial contracts

Legal Commercial Law

It is common for contracts between businesses to contain provisions that are aimed at preventing one of the parties from competing against the other (often called “restraint of trade” clauses). The enforceability of such clauses has long been debated.

Under UK law the following requirements must be satisfied for a restraint of trade to be valid:

  • the party imposing the restraint must have a legitimate interest that they seek to protect;
  • the restraint must be no wider than is reasonable to protect that interest;
  • the restraint must not be against public interest.

In a recent case the Supreme Court re-examined this area. The Court stated that two principles must be taken into account in determining the enforceability of a non-competition obligation:

  1. The party which has the benefit of the restriction must establish that the non-compete clause was reasonable as between the parties, by showing that it not only protected that party’s legitimate interests but also that it went no further than was reasonably necessary in doing so.
  2. Assuming the test in paragraph 1 above is met, the party subject to the restrictions has the burden of establishing that it is unreasonable due to being against public policy.

Of particular interest in this case is the Supreme Court’s consideration of the parties’ non-contractual intentions when entering into the contract. This means that legitimate interests do not need to be specifically referenced in the contract.

For a “legitimate interest” to be potentially protected, that interest does not have to be something which is directly related to the contract containing the restriction. In the case examined by the Supreme Court, the contract in question was a confidentiality agreement (also known as a non-disclosure agreement). Its purpose was simply to allow the flow of information from one party to the other, but the agreement contained a clause prohibiting the recipient of the information from exploiting it for its own purposes. This was found to be enforceable, even though the agreement did not express that the provider of the information had any obligations or expectation of its own in relation to that information.

Further Information

If you have any questions regarding the above, or require any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dixcart Legal on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Law
Changes to Companies House fees

From 1st May 2024, Companies House will be increasing its filing fees for various services as part of its broader initiative to improve the integrity of the UK registry under […]

banner services

News & Views

Directors’ conflicts of interest

Commercial Law

Under Section 177 of the Companies Act 2006 any director who is in any way, directly or indirectly, interested in a proposed transaction or arrangement with a company, has a duty to declare the nature and extent of that interest to the other directors (unless it cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest).

Purpose of the director’s duty to declare an interest

The purpose of duty is to ensure that the other directors are aware of a director’s interest and have the necessary information to enable them to properly assess whether the proposed transaction should be approved.

Main features of the duty to declare an interest

The duty is owed by the director to the company, which means that only the company has the right to enforce that duty. It is an internal matter and therefore does not constitute a criminal offence.

The duty is interpreted strictly, meaning that it is a director’s absolute duty to declare their interest. Consequently, a breach of s.177 may be technical, without the need for any deliberate wrongdoing.

When does the director have an interest in a proposed transaction?

At the most basic level, a director will be interested in a transaction if, for example, they are the counter-party to a contract with the company, or if they are buying an asset from or selling one to the company. 

However, the duty to declare also applies to indirect interests, which may include the company:

  • dealing with the director’s spouse or family;
  • dealing with another company in which the director has a stake;
  • buying or selling an asset which affects something owned by the director (for example land adjoining land owned by the director).

The duty to declare an interest arises whenever the director is interested in a proposed “transaction or arrangement” with the company. This wording is extremely broad and will include more than simple contractual dealings.   

Exceptions

A director is not obliged to declare an interest where:

  • the director is not aware (or should not reasonably be aware) that they have an interest, or are unaware that the transaction has been proposed or even exists;
  • they do have an interest, but where it cannot be reasonably regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest;
  • if the other directors are, or ought reasonably to be, aware;
  • the shareholders have approved the conflict of interest (with informed consent). 

How does the director comply with the duty? 

The director must disclose his/her interest to the other directors. Only full and frank disclosure will be adequate to a company with the duty to declare. Disclosure may be made in writing or verbally, but full records must be kept.

Effect of declaring an interest

Declaring an interest protects the company and the director against some action by shareholders. However, it does not override the directors’ general duty to consider whether entering into the proposed transaction is in the company’s interests, nor does it override anything in the company’s articles of association regarding decision-making (for example, the articles may provide that conflicted directors may not vote at board meetings on the matter in question).

Failure to declare an interest

If the director has not declared an interest, then the company could seek to rescind any contract (i.e. declare it void) as against the director.

In addition, the company may have a claim against the director for breach of their fiduciary duty to the company, giving rise to a right to compensation.

In extremis, the company might have a claim against the director for commercial fraud (although, as noted above, a failure to declare an interest is not a criminal matter).

There is also the possibility of a claim by shareholders for unfair prejudice, or by the Registrar of Companies for an order seeking disqualification of the individual from acting as a company director.

Ratification by shareholders

If a director has failed to declare an interest, the matter may be ratified (i.e. approved) by the shareholders after the event.

Conclusion

The duty to declare an interest in any proposed transaction or arrangement with a company is important and far-reaching, and the risks of failure to comply are substantial for the director personally. Directors should remain alert to the possibility of any conflict of interest and be prudent in deciding whether or not to inform the other directors of a potential conflict.

Further Information

If you have any questions regarding the above, or require any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dixcart Legal on: hello@dixcartuk.com


Back

The data contained within this document is for general information only. No responsibility can be accepted for inaccuracies. Readers are also advised that the law and practice may change from time to time. This document is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute accounting, legal or tax advice. Professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.


Related News

Commercial Law
Changes to Companies House fees

From 1st May 2024, Companies House will be increasing its filing fees for various services as part of its broader initiative to improve the integrity of the UK registry under […]